Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Can Special Relativity Explain the Alice and Bob Spin Measurement Paradox?
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="bobob, post: 6823534, member: 648972"] If the two photons have a spacelike seperation when measured, the two photons were always spacelike seperated. The two photons produced by parametric down conversion have never interacted with each other. I think the use of the term "non-local" is not helpful here. It is used inconsistently to mean different things in different articles. Again, I don't think the use of "non-local" here means what you are trying to suggest. Why do you think the above implies what you have in brackets below? First, the use of synchronized here doesn't relate to the standard usage (as Einstein used it) of the word in which synchronization takes place via causal processes. The two photons are created with a spacelike seperation, so I don't know what synchronization means in that context. The following article on parametric down conversion might be interesting: [URL]https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1809/1809.00127.pdf[/URL] In an earlier post you mentioned "influences" as different from "cause." How are those not synonymous here? In Bell's type experiments, the measurements are independant of each other, which by definition means the measurements are not causally connected. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Can Special Relativity Explain the Alice and Bob Spin Measurement Paradox?
Back
Top