Main Question or Discussion Point
The intention here is to discuss paradoxes in Special relativity in mainstream physics, any idea?
This is from your paper,Thanks, very good, also it happens to be another paradox, which arguments that Lorentz Transformation would be violated for two slow moving observers that observe a fast moving lab system.
I'm sure you are aware that energy and momentum are not Lorentz invariant independently, and have taken this into account.... this means O’ and O” frames will measure the energy of created pairs differently which is inconsistent with Special Relativity principal.
...so far there is no evidence that speed of light would be invariant in
vacuum regardless it is emitted form a stationary or moving body....
Sorry it was a miss spelling "weather" should be "whether"As regards: energy and momentum, imagine, different systems measure their own energy or mass with regards to their invariant mass, but other systems measure their energy increased relatively by ɣ for instance. In a moving system, the energy of the photon is also increased by same factor ɣ measured by a stationary system. So far so good as the energy is consistent with weather measured by the moving observer or stationary observer, so is the created pairs' masses. But considering the fact in above article this gets inconsistent for instance for the slow moving observers.
As regards the other statement that speed of light is invariant in vacuum, so far there is no evidence that can prove the opposite but the speed of light is variant in for instance in different gases with different densities and is measurable, this means that absolute motion is detectable and not relative as Einstein thought.
No, this only allows you to detect motion relative to the gas, it doesn't pick out a preferred inertial reference frame. If you have one box of gas A and an identical box of gas B moving at high speed relative to A, and you send light through both boxes, observers at rest relative to each box of gas will get the same answer v1 when they measure the speed of light through their own box, and they will also both get the same answer v2 when they measure the speed of light through the other box.As regards the other statement that speed of light is invariant in vacuum, so far there is no evidence that can prove the opposite but the speed of light is variant in for instance in different gases with different densities and is measurable, this means that absolute motion is detectable and not relative as Einstein thought.
Looks like you are trying to promote your paper. From the abstract:The intention here is to discuss paradoxes in Special relativity in mainstream physics, any idea?
The above is known to be incorrect. I thought this forum was closed to promoting and debating fringe theories, correct?Eventually it is shown that observation by none-inertial frame is Galilean transformation
rather than Lorentz transformation. Conclusion: The outcome of physical experiments observed by inertial and none-inertial observers are completely different as they observe i.e., a fast-moving inertial frame which potentially contradicts Lorentz symmetry.