- #1
bhsmith
- 37
- 0
I am trying to find any type of argument against special relativity. for example, why would someone think believe that Newtonian relativity is more valid than special relativity?
Newtonian mechanics is a set of physical laws that describe the motion of objects in the everyday world, while Special Relativity is a theory that explains the behavior of objects moving at high speeds or in strong gravitational fields.
Special Relativity takes into account the concept of relative motion and the speed of light as a constant, while Newtonian mechanics assumes that time and space are absolute.
Some scientists argue that Special Relativity is based on theoretical concepts and has not been proven through physical experiments. Others claim that it is a limited theory that does not account for certain phenomena, such as gravitational effects.
Special Relativity has led to the development of other important theories, such as General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, which have greatly expanded our understanding of the universe and the laws that govern it.
Although Special Relativity is considered more accurate, Newtonian mechanics is still used in certain situations, such as in low-speed or low-gravity environments. Some scientists are working on theories that could potentially merge the two concepts into a more comprehensive understanding of the physical world.