Specific Heat of Nitrogen Molecule

  • Thread starter Finaid
  • Start date
  • #1
10
0

Homework Statement



Estimate the precise value for the specific heat of a nitrogen molecule at T=13.6K

Homework Equations


I'm pretty sure the correct equation is:
Cp = (7/2)*R + R((hv)/(kT))2 *((e(hv/kT))/(e(hv/kT)-1)2
So R=8.314 J K-1mol-1
T=13.6K
h=6.626*10-34m2kg s-1
k=2pi/λ
v= ?


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I know that diatomic molecules oscillate at a single characteristic frequency,v, but I'm not sure how to find what frequency that is and without it I can't finish the equation. I figure if I had the frequency, I could find λ or vice versa but I need both to finish the problem. Or am I approaching this in too straightforward a manner?
Any help or confirmation that I'm at least headed in the right direction would be appreciated.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
rude man
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
7,930
818
Such equations are always approximate and of questionable value to physicists, chemists and engineers from a practical view.

Bryant in 1934 came up with a formula for molar specific heat at constant pressure:
cp = a + bT + cT2

For N2 he gave
a = 6.30 cal/mole-K
b = 1.819e-3 cal/mole-K
c = -0.345e-6 cal/mole-K.

It depends on what stage of thermodynamics you're at. Modern expressions have indeed increased the accuracy of this parameter. Afraid I'm not knowledgeable about them.


Of course, to get the specific heat of a single molecule you have to divide by Avogadro's number.
 
  • #3
10
0
Well, I'm a 3rd year Physics Undergrad and this is a question for my Quantum Physics class, not Thermodynamics. I think that's why I have to use the equation above and in the derivation I have for that, Avogadro's number cancels out somewhere along the way. There's a section in my lecture notes deriving this equation for specific heat of a diatomic molecule, but no examples or mention of how to find v.
 
  • #5
10
0
Thanks for giving it a go anyway!
 
  • #6
10
0
Could I put the frequency v=c/λ? I don't know whether I'm able to assume the conditions for a vacuum, but it would cancel out λ, the wavelength and then ((e(hv/kT))/(e(hv/kT)-1) would go to zero, which would leave Cp=7R/2. This doesn't seem right but it's more than I had yesterday.
 
  • #7
1
0
You're in PH356, yeah?
 
  • #8
10
0
Yes, sadly.
 

Related Threads on Specific Heat of Nitrogen Molecule

  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
986
Replies
8
Views
969
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
13K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Top