Speed of Probability Waves?

[Usaf Moji]

According to author John Gribbin, the state vector, or $$\Psi$$, or "probability waves" (whatever you want to call it) travels at the speed of light:

But all of this still applied only to electromagnetic radiation. The gian leap taken bhy John Cramer was to extend these ideas to the wave equations of quantum mechanics - the Schrodinger equation itself, and the equations describing the probability waves, which travel, like photons, at the speed of light. [p. 235, Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality - a very good book, btw]

My question is, how do we know $$\Psi$$ travels at the speed of light?

I had a look at John Cramer's article (see http://www.npl.washington.edu/npl/int_rep/tiqm/TI_toc.html [Broken]) but couldn't find any clues there.

 

[Meir Achuz]

Have you considered the possibility that JG is wrong?

 

[peter0302]

Cramer's model only gets the probability waves to travel at c by allowing them to travel backwards in time. It's just a mathematical model for what's going on, similar to the backwards-in-time interpretation of antimatter. No one knows if there's literally a boson or wave or what-have-you that travels at the speed of light that "enforces" the Schrodinger equation.

 

[rbj]

According to author John Gribbin, the state vector, or $$\Psi$$, or "probability waves" (whatever you want to call it) travels at the speed of light...

i thought that the phase velocity of deBroglie waves were faster than c. at something like c²/v, where v < c and is the velocity of the particle with the wave expression of $\Psi$.

isn't that the case?

 

[peter0302]

c^2/v isn't fast enough for photons - that would only be 'c'.

 

[rbj]

c^2/v isn't fast enough for photons - that would only be 'c'.

photons don't move at a velocity v=c? and the corresponding wave speed for light is not c?

that c²/v expression for phase velocity actually came out of a ca. 1975 introduction to modern physics text. the group velocity was the same as the particle speed, v.

 

[DavidWhitbeck]

Why are we even discussing photons in the context of non-relativistic qm?

But all of this still applied only to electromagnetic radiation. The gian leap taken bhy John Cramer was to extend these ideas to the wave equations of quantum mechanics - the Schrodinger equation itself, and the equations describing the probability waves, which travel, like photons, at the speed of light.

Since the Schrodinger Eqn. is not Lorentz invariant, it's difficult for me to care about superluminal speeds from it.

That being said, wave propagation can be superluminal as long as causality isn't violated. It's what we measure that's important, and as rbj pointed out it ain't phase velocity.

 

[peter0302]

photons don't move at a velocity v=c? and the corresponding wave speed for light is not c?

Sure, the corresponding wave speed for light would be 'c', but unless you're going at 'c' _backwards in time_, you can't use a v=c wave to explain quantum phenomina. Experiments have shown that if a signal were transmitted between quantum particles, it would have to travel _faster_ than c between the two particles.