Speed of shockwaves

  • #1
173
18
To put it simply, can a shock wave move faster than the speed of sound?

A lot of people seem to think so, and it might even be, but based on the wrong arguments. 'Sonic boom is caused when an object is travelling faster than the speed of sound' so the argument starts. OK, that is clearly the wrong start of an argument but the question is still a good one.

I never studied fluid physics before, but my intuition suggests shock waves can move faster than the speed of sound but it soon reduces to speed of sound.

To make the problem a little more specific, let's consider a stationary dynamite exploding.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
173
18
Thanks for the link, it does answer the question :D I was looking at the shock wave page only.
 
  • #4
davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2021 Award
9,590
8,689
so what SPECIFICALLY is your question ?

this one ?
To put it simply, can a shock wave move faster than the speed of sound?

yes

I never studied fluid physics before, but my intuition suggests shock waves can move faster than the speed of sound but it soon reduces to speed of sound.

maybe you should ;)

but it soon reduces to speed of sound.

That tells me nothing specific or useable

How quickly and how much it will slow will depend on what the shock wave is travelling through
type of material, its density, temperature to name 3 variables


To make the problem a little more specific, let's consider a stationary dynamite exploding.

That link I gave you gives important information on what kinds of explosives or other factors will or will not create a blast wave/shock wave as does the wiki on shock waves ....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_wave


Dave
 
Last edited:
  • #5
173
18
To quote myself
To put it simply, can a shock wave move faster than the speed of sound?
And the answer is 'yes'.
 
  • #6
davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2021 Award
9,590
8,689
To quote myself

And the answer is 'yes'.


and your point is ?

The wiki link told you that ;)
 
  • #7
173
18
I know. I'm under the impression that you misread my previous post. I said "thanks for the link. it does answer the question". And that was it.
 
  • #8
davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2021 Award
9,590
8,689
LOL DOH

I humbly apologise ... I need new glasses ( wait a minute they are relatively new ...maybe new eyes)

Sorry buddy :)

Dave
 
  • #9
173
18
Haha That's ok! =)
 

Related Threads on Speed of shockwaves

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
14K
Replies
8
Views
272
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
11K
Top