Sphere in a potential well

  • Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date
  • #1
2,793
594
Imagine you put a sphere on a track which is part of a vertical circle.You expect the sphere to roll in a path like a pendulum.it should do it like a mass on an almost frictionless surface because the friction of the surface is rolling the sphere not stopping it and the air drag isn't very high.
But in one of the Walter Lewin's MIT video lectures,He did such a thing but the period was less than what he predicted with conservation of energy and the sphere stopped rolling in a short time that I didn't expect.He didn't explain why that happens and the problem is I can't explain it and its killing me.really need some help.
thanks
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
263
0
It has to be some kind of dissipation of energy... you cannot make a perfectly frictionless surface..
 
  • #3
46
0
This is because of air resistance even if it is not very high .Also the surface is almost frictionless but not completely without friction
 
  • #4
2,793
594
Yes I could think of that.But at first he asks students what's the reason and when they say friction,he says no.friction is not that much.
 
  • #5
Delta2
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,566
1,378
if ball was sliding without rolling (this means that friction is trully zero since the torque from friction is what makes the ball rotate) then with simple conservation of energy the ball would continue forever. But due to the torque from friction some energy is converted to heat.
 
  • #6
2,793
594
if ball was sliding without rolling...
I think you meant:
If ball was rolling without sliding.

...But due to the torque from friction some energy is converted to heat.
this is in contrast to your first sentence.

In fact here we have two retarding forces:
1)Air drag
2)Because you can't have perfect rolling,there is just a little sliding and that intoduces a little friction.
But as I said,Lewin said that friction is not the reason.
The difference between Lewin's prediction of period and the real period was higher than an amount that could be possible due to such small frictions.
 
  • #7
84
2
I have not seen the video but I am fairly sure I know what he was trying to get the students to understand.

If the sphere slides on the track you get one answer for the period, if it rolls you get a different period. The key is the conservation of energy. A sliding sphere just exchanges energy between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. A rolling sphere has to share the potential energy between kinetic energy and the energy of its own rotation due to its moment of inertia.

The friction and hence the damping is also different between the sliding and rolling scenarios.

Hope this helps.

Regards

Sam
 
  • #8
Delta2
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,566
1,378
Ok seems i was wrong, only possible losses seem due to not perfect rolling as you said. Probably there is some other factor in the experiment which eludes our attention.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
2,793
594
The point is the period formula differs by a factor of sqrt(10/7).
also because the process of accelerating the ball takes more time because of rolling,I think in that time there is some sliding and so it stops sooner than an object sliding on an almost frictionless surface.
 

Related Threads on Sphere in a potential well

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
998
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
977
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
806
  • Last Post
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Top