Solving the Spherical Oscillator Problem

In summary, the expressions for energy and the angular momentum are correct, but the equation for the ellipse does not seem to work.
  • #1
T-7
64
0
Hi,

I'd really appreciate some speedy advice on this question. I need to know whether the expressions for energy and the angular momentum are correct, as I seem unable to produce the final expression desired from what I have derived.

Here's the problem:

Homework Statement



The Lagrangian is

[tex]L = \mu \nu^{2}/2 - kr^{2}/2[/tex]

i. Calculate the angular momentum vector, L, proving that L is constant and that, unless L vanishes, the oscillation occurs in the x,y plane.

ii. Using [tex]x = x_{0}cos(\omega t), y = y_{0}sin(\omega t)[/tex], show the trajectory is an ellipse. Express the energy, E, and then both the eccentricity and the parameter in terms of E and Lz.

iii. Representing the trajectory in polar coordinates by [tex]x = rcos(\phi), y = rsin(\phi)[/tex], show that you get the simple relation

[tex]
cos (2\phi) = \frac{1 - \nu^{2} / (2\xi^{2})}{\sqrt{1 - \nu^{2}}} ,
r = \sqrt{ \frac{2E}{k} }\xi ,
\nu = \frac{ L_{z}\omega }{E}
[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



For i. I found that [tex]L = Lz = \mu \omega x_{0}y_{0}sin(\phi_{x}-\phi_{y})[/tex] (assuming L is not zero), by using three sine equations for the x,y and z components (with angle offsets) and taking [tex]L = m(r \times v)[/tex]; I chose my axis so that x and y could be rewritten as [tex]x = x_{0}cos(\omega t), y = y_{0}sin(\omega t)[/tex], and then find I can write [tex]Lz = \mu \omega x_{0}y_{0}[/tex].

For ii., it seemed all that was required was to square both expressions and combine thus:

[tex]\frac{x}{x_{0}}^{2} + \frac{y}{y_{0}}^{2} = 1[/tex]

Writing the energy [tex]E = \mu \nu^{2}/2 + kr^{2}/2[/tex] and substituting the expressions for x and y, I found the expression to boil down to [tex]E = \frac{(\mu \omega^{2})}{2} (x_{0}^{2}+y_{0}^{2})[/tex] where [tex] \omega^{2} = k/m[/tex].

I'm guessing I need to go ahead and solve this equation for x0 (assuming it's right) by using Lz to get rid of y0, and hope that something which looks like the eccentricity and the parameter will emerge (?).

Part iii. has me really stuck. I substitute [tex]x = rcos(\phi), y = rsin(\phi)[/tex] into the ellipse equation, which looks like a promising start, use double angle results to turn the cos and the sine into [tex]cos (2\phi)[/tex], and eventually obtain (after some simply rearranging):

[tex]cos (2\phi) = \frac{1-r^{2}/2(1/x_{0}^{2}+1/y_{0}^{2})}{r^{2}/2(1/x_{0}^{2}-1/y_{0}^{2})}[/tex]

Multiplying numerator and denomiator by [tex]x_{0}y_{0}[/tex] and using my expressions derived earlier for Energy and Lz I arrive at:

[tex]cos (2\phi) = \frac{L_{z}^{2}/\mu^{2}\omega^{2}-r^{2}/2(2E/\mu\omega^{2})}{r^{2}/2(y_{0}^{2}-x_{0}^{2})}[/tex]

It looks promising, but once the first term on the numerator has been made one, it seems no manipulation can make this equation correspond to the one given. I can only presume my energy, angular moment or ellipse equations are wrong? But are they?

Many thanks for your insights!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hey, Can I just ask how you got the expression for [itex]E=\frac{(\mu\omega^2)}{2}(x_0^2+y^2_0)[/itex]
 
  • #3
I've been working on this problem as well, and I think that the expression for the energy should have a k term

[itex]E=\frac{(\mu\omega^2)}{2}(x_0^2+y^2_0)+\frac{k^2}{2}}(x_0^2+y^2_0)[/itex]

Because if you put the terms for xo and yo in for r I can't see why the k term would disappear. Also for your expression for the ellipse the denominators should be squared.

I haven't gone any further with this yet, but the method seems like it should work from what you've explained.
 
  • #4
Can I just ask if we are all handing this in tomorrow for a certain classical mechanics module at a certain Scottish University?

I tried using Maple to get the expression for E which comes out as:
[itex]E=\frac{k}{2}(x_0^2+y_0^2)[/itex]

I can't seem to get very far with the next question and haven't even looked at the last one. Oh Classical Mechanics!

has anyone had any luck getting the eccentricity out?
 
Last edited:

1. What is the Spherical Oscillator Problem?

The Spherical Oscillator Problem is a mathematical concept that involves finding the solutions to a differential equation that describes the motion of a particle constrained to a spherical surface, under the influence of a central force.

2. Why is the Spherical Oscillator Problem important?

The Spherical Oscillator Problem has applications in various fields of physics, such as quantum mechanics, classical mechanics, and celestial mechanics. It helps us understand the behavior of particles in a spherical system and can be applied to real-world scenarios.

3. How is the Spherical Oscillator Problem solved?

The Spherical Oscillator Problem can be solved using various mathematical techniques, such as separation of variables, integration, and series expansions. It also involves solving the associated Legendre differential equation and applying boundary conditions to obtain the solutions.

4. What are some challenges in solving the Spherical Oscillator Problem?

One of the main challenges in solving the Spherical Oscillator Problem is the complexity of the mathematical equations involved. It also requires a good understanding of advanced mathematical concepts and techniques. Additionally, finding the appropriate boundary conditions can be difficult in some cases.

5. How does solving the Spherical Oscillator Problem contribute to scientific knowledge?

Solving the Spherical Oscillator Problem allows us to gain a deeper understanding of the behavior of particles in a spherical system and how they are influenced by central forces. This knowledge can be applied to various fields of physics and can also help in developing new theories and models to explain physical phenomena.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
847
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
988
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
450
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
315
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
670
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
749
Replies
1
Views
802
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top