Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have a question from Perkins:

I'm not sure I understand the line in boldface. If [itex]s_\pi = 1[/itex] then why is [itex]S_z = 0[/itex]? For neutral pions, the existence of the decay

[tex]\pi^{0} \longrightarrow 2\gamma[/tex]

proves that the pion spin must be integral (since Sy = 1) and that [itex]s_\pi \neq 1[/itex], from the following argument. It can be proved as a consequence of relativistic invariance that for any massless particle of spin s, there are only two possible spin substates, [itex]S_z = \pm s[/itex], where z is the direction of motion. Taking the common line of flight of the photons in the pion rest frame as the quantisation axis, the z-component of total photon spin in the above decay can thus have the values Sz = 0 or 2.Suppose [itex]s_\pi = 1[/itex]; then only [itex]S_z = 0[/itex] is possible, and the two-photon amplitude must behave under rotation like the polynomial [itex]P_{l}^{m}(\cos \theta)[/itex] with m = 0, where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the angle of the photon relative to the z-axis.

Thanks!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Spin of the pion

Loading...

Similar Threads - Spin pion | Date |
---|---|

A I need a spherically symmetric spin-dependent NN potential | Mar 10, 2018 |

I Spin vs Helicity conservation | Mar 6, 2018 |

A Nuclear spin of Fluorine 19 | Dec 20, 2017 |

I Spin and parity of pion decay | Jul 18, 2016 |

The spin of neutral pion | Nov 4, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**