Spin wavefunction confusion

  • Thread starter barnflakes
  • Start date
  • #1
156
4
My lecturer writes:

The spin wavefunctions are symmetric on exchange of spins for the spin 3/2 states. These states include:

[tex]|\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \rangle [/tex]

and [tex]|\uparrow \uparrow \downarrow \rangle + |\uparrow \downarrow \uparrow \rangle + |\downarrow \uparrow \uparrow \rangle [/tex]

How is the second wavefunction a state for a spin 3/2 particle? I thought the spin is 1/2 + 1/2 - 1/2 = 1, so the measured spin can be 1, 0 or -1?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
505
0
Start with the spin 1 states that you get from adding two spin 1/2 particles and then add the third, standard excersice in QM

|++>

|+-> + |-+>

|-->

are the three spin 1 states you can build from adding two spin 1/2 particles-

The second state you wrote is the |S, S_z> = |3/2, 1> state
 
  • #3
156
4
How are they spin 1 states though? How do you figure that out from those states?
 
  • #4
505
0
How are they spin 1 states though? How do you figure that out from those states?
Have you done adding angular momenta in your QM class yet? yes or no?
 
  • #5
156
4
We did it briefly, just in terms of quantum numbers though, so S = s1 + s2...|s1-s2|, we didn't relate it to the spin wavefunctions like the ones you have mentioned.
 
  • #6
505
0
ok, there are three spin-1 states - do you agree?

do you also agree that |+-> + |-+> has S_z = 0?

and total spin

S^2 = (S_1 + S_2)^2 on that state gives s(s+1) = 1(1+1) = 2

as eigenvalue.

S^2 on |+-> + |-+> gives 0, right?
 

Related Threads on Spin wavefunction confusion

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
700
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
701
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Top