Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am confused on a very basic fact. I can write [itex]\xi = (\xi_{1}, \xi_{2}) [/itex] and a spin rotation matrix as

[tex]

U =

\left( \begin{array}{ccc}

e^{-\frac{i}{2}\phi} & 0 \\

0 & e^{\frac{i}{2}\phi}

\end{array} \right)

[/tex]

A spinor rotates under a [itex]2\pi[/itex] rotation as

[tex]

\xi ' =

\left( \begin{array}{ccc}

e^{-i\pi} & 0 \\

0 & e^{i\pi}

\end{array} \right)

\left( \begin{array}{c}

\xi_{1} \\

\xi_{2}

\end{array} \right)

=

\left( \begin{array}{ccc}

-\xi_{1} \\

\xi_{2}

\end{array} \right)

[/tex]

which is [itex](-\xi_{1}, \xi_{2})[/itex], and not [itex]-\xi[/itex], so only one component changes sign. Is this correct?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Spinor rotation

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Spinor rotation | Date |
---|---|

A What's the idea behind propagators | Feb 25, 2018 |

A Spin of boosted spinor | Jan 25, 2018 |

I Normalisation constant expansion of spinor field | Jan 14, 2018 |

Doubt regarding rotations in spinor space | Aug 25, 2013 |

Understanding spin, spinors, and rotations | Feb 14, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**