Spinor transformations

  • A
  • Thread starter nigelscott
  • Start date
  • #1
135
4

Main Question or Discussion Point

I am trying to understand the derivation of the Dirac adjoint. I understand the derivation of the following identities involving Spinors, the Gamma matrices and Lorentz transformations:

(Sμν) = γ0Sμνγ0

s[Λ] = exp(ΩμνSμν/2)

s[Λ] = exp(Ωμν(Sμν/2))

The part I'm having trouble with is showing that the last line is also equal to:

γ0S[Λ]-1γ0

Its probably simple but I'm having a mental block with it. Appreciate any help to get me going again.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,279
636
You should also dagger the Omega; it can be complex in general. Without doing the calculation myself, it seems you need the Clifford algebra and give an expression for the inverse of S. But this should be in any decent qft book, like Peskin.
 
  • #4
Well, ##(\gamma^0)^2 = 1##, so for any ##n##, ##(\gamma^0 S_{\mu\nu}\gamma^0)^n = \gamma^0 (S_{\mu\nu})^n \gamma^0##. Using this and the series expression ##\exp x = \sum \frac{x^n}{n!}## should make this clear. But it is not clear to me how this works for general, complex ##\Omega## as haushofer said...
 
  • #5
135
4
OK. So just to verify (neglecting indeces):

γ0(1 + iΩS)γ0

multiplying from left and right gives:

γ0γ0 - iΩγ0Sγ0

= exp(-iΩγ0Sγ0)

correct.
 
  • #6
Thats what I think (last equal of course up to order ##\Omega^2##).
 

Related Threads on Spinor transformations

Replies
6
Views
683
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
677
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
80
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
778
Replies
1
Views
520
Top