I am currently working through spivak's calculus on manifolds (which i love by the way) in one of my class. my question is about his notation for partial derivatives. i completely understand why he uses it and how the classical notation has some ambiguity to it. however, i can't help but thinking of partial derivatives, the chain rule (from R^n to R), and such in terms of the classical notation that i have used for so long. even my professor, though he sometimes uses spivak's notation, slips into the classical notation, especially when he is lecturing without notes.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

my question is what notation do you prefer? i haven't seen spivak's notation anywhere outside this book even though it is such a well known book and the notation has obvious advantages. does anyone else use in their daily lives?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Spivak's calculus on manifolds

Loading...

Similar Threads - Spivak's calculus manifolds | Date |
---|---|

I Spivak's Definition of Integrals vs Stewart's | Nov 27, 2016 |

Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds: Theorem 5-3 | Aug 2, 2015 |

Spivak calculus on manifolds | Nov 12, 2010 |

Spivak (Calculus on Manifolds) proof of stolkes theorem | Aug 22, 2010 |

Typo in spivak's calculus on manifolds? | Jul 7, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**