Spring and particles in motion problem

In summary, the problem involves two particles connected to springs, with the fixed point Q located above the fixed point O. The particles are in motion on the z-axis, and the equation for the center of mass c is given by \ddot{c} = ( \frac {\lambda L} {2lm} - g ) - \frac { \lambda} {lm} c, where L is the vector distance between Q and O, and g is the constant acceleration due to gravity. This equation can be derived by treating the particles separately and taking into account the forces from the springs on each particle.
  • #1
ElDavidas
80
0
Here's another Q I'm stuck on:

"Two particles P1 and P2 of equal mass m are connected to springs as in the diagram below.
Q__
/
\
/
* p1
\
/
\
* p2
/
\
/
\
__0

The springs are identical, each having natural length l and modulus [tex]\lambda[/tex]. The fixed point Q is at a height L vertically above the fixed point O (L > 3l). Take the origin of coordinates at O and the z-axis vertically upwards and let c be the z-coordinate of the centre of mass of the particles.

The particles are in motion. Suppose that the particles remain on the z-axis throughout the motion. Show that c satisfies the equation

[tex]\ddot{c} = ( \frac {\lambda L} {2lm} - g ) - \frac { \lambda} {lm} c[/tex]

[You should assume that acceleration due to gravity, g, is constant and that the springs obey Hooke's law throughout the motion.]"

I don't know where to begin on this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First draw free-body diagrams and find the location of c at equilibrium.
Notice that if g were 0 , c would be L/2 .

You could treat P1 + P2 + MiddleSpring as one object, but
you might want to treat P1 and P2 separately, at z1 and z2 ...
(c = (z1 + z2)/2 ; c's acceleration is the average of az1 and az2).

displace P1 from its equilibruim by dz1 , displace P2 from equilib by dz2 .
calculate the acceleration of each , then average them.
If you keep your signs straight, you'll see that MiddleSpring causes no acceleration of the center-of-mass since it pulls oppositely on P1 and P2.
 
  • #3
Hmm, I'm not really too confident as to how to lay out my solution. I'm assuming that the springs have been pulled away from the origin.
Using your method said above, so far I have:

For particle 1

[tex] m \ddot{z}_1 = T_1 - T_2 - mg [/tex]

[tex] m \ddot{z}_1= \frac {\lambda} {l} ( dz_1 - l) - \frac {\lambda} {l} ( dz_1 - l) - mg[/tex]

And particle 2

[tex] m \ddot{z}_2 = T_2 - T_3 - mg [/tex]

[tex] m \ddot{z}_2= \frac {\lambda} {l} ( dz_2 - l) - \frac {\lambda} {l} ( dz_2 - l) - mg[/tex]

Am I on the right lines or is this completely wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
The centre of mass of the system is c where [tex]c = (z_1 + z_2)/2.[/tex]
Also, [tex]2\ddot c = (\ddot z_1 + \ddot z_2)[/tex]

[tex]m\ddot z_1 =T_1 - T_2 - mg[/tex]
[tex]m\ddot z_2 = T_2 - T_3 - mg[/tex]

[tex]m(\ddot z_1 + \ddot z_2) = T_1 - T_3 - 2mg[/tex]
[tex]2m\ddot c = T_1 - T_3 - 2mg, \mbox{ putting }2\ddot c = (\ddot z_1 + \ddot z_2)[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Expansion in Spring1: } T_1 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(l_1-l) = \frac{\lambda}{l}
(-z_1 -l)\ <-- \ (z_1 \mbox{ is -ve})[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{Expansion in Spring2: } T_2 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(l_2-l) = \frac{\lambda}{l}(-(z_2 - z_1) - l)\ <-- \mbox{ don't acually need this!}[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{Expansion in Spring3: } T_3 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(l_3-l) = \frac{\lambda}{l}((-L + z_2) - l)[/tex]

[tex]T_1 - T_3 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(-z_1 - l) - \frac{\lambda}{l}((-L + z_2) - l)[/tex]
[tex]T_1 - T_3 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(-z_1 - l + L - z_2 + l)[/tex]
[tex]T_1 - T_3 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(L - (z_1 + z_2))[/tex]
[tex]T_1 - T_3 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(L - 2c)[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Substituting for } T_1 - T_3,[/tex]

[tex]2m\ddot c = \frac{\lambda}{l}(L - 2c) - 2mg[/tex]
[tex]\ddot c = (\frac{\lambda L}{2lm} - g) - \frac{\lambda}{lm}\cdot c[/tex]

I've had to assume that, as a measured dimension, L is a vector quantity and hence negative, rather than a (positive) scalar quantity.

http://img322.imageshack.us/img322/738/eldavidas4zn.th.jpg
 

Attachments

  • eldavidas.jpg
    eldavidas.jpg
    22.3 KB · Views: 315
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is the relationship between spring and particles in motion?

The relationship between spring and particles in motion is that a spring is a mechanical device that can store and release energy, while particles in motion refer to objects that are constantly moving due to the forces acting upon them. When a spring is attached to a particle, it can cause the particle to move due to the energy stored in the spring.

2. How does the spring constant affect the motion of particles?

The spring constant is a measure of the stiffness of a spring, and it affects the motion of particles by determining how much force is needed to stretch or compress the spring. A higher spring constant means the spring is stiffer and requires more force to stretch or compress, resulting in a faster motion of the particles attached to the spring.

3. How do you calculate the potential energy of a spring?

The potential energy of a spring can be calculated using the formula U = 1/2 * k * x^2, where U is the potential energy, k is the spring constant, and x is the displacement of the spring from its equilibrium position. This formula is based on the principle that the potential energy stored in a spring is directly proportional to the square of its displacement.

4. What is the equilibrium position of a spring?

The equilibrium position of a spring is the position at which the forces acting on the spring are balanced and the spring is neither stretched nor compressed. This is also the position at which the potential energy of the spring is at its minimum.

5. How does the mass of the particle affect the motion of the spring?

The mass of the particle attached to a spring affects its motion by determining its inertia. A larger mass will have a greater inertia and require more force to be moved, resulting in a slower motion of the spring and particle system. On the other hand, a smaller mass will have less inertia and require less force, resulting in a faster motion.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
262
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
196
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
707
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
796
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
786
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top