Square roots and square

  • #1
169
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

I don't get this problem and why the answer is what the book states that it should be:

If [tex]f(x)=\sqrt{x^{2}}[/tex] then f(x) can also be expressed as: l x l

The answer I chose was simply x , but I don't know why it is wrong.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,916
17
From a practical point of view, you memorized a wrong statement
[itex]x = \sqrt{x^2}[/itex]​
and you need to unlearn it and memorize the correct statement
[itex]|x| = \sqrt{x^2}[/itex] (for any real number x).​


As for "why" it's wrong, at what values of x does your answer disagree with the correct answer? Have you tried plugging one of those values into the expression [itex]\sqrt{x^2}[/itex]?
 
  • #3
169
0
Also, I'm perplexed about this problem:

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} (\frac{3x^{2}+4x-5}{6x^{2}+3x+1})[/tex]

How do you solve this algebraically/numerically? I've tried graphing it on my calculator and I can clearly see that it approached .5 but how come when I put infinity into x in the table it f(x) shows up as 1?? Weird..
 
  • #4
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,916
17
Also, I'm perplexed about this problem:

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} (\frac{3x^{2}+4x-5}{6x^{2}+3x+1})[/tex]

How do you solve this algebraically/numerically? I've tried graphing it on my calculator and I can clearly see that it approached .5 but how come when I put infinity into x in the table it f(x) shows up as 1?? Weird..
Table? What table?

This is one of the standard examples in your calculus book: when you have rational functions (or rational function-like things), and you want to analyze them "at" infinity, you should divide the numerator and denominator by the highest power of your variable that appears in the expression.
 
  • #5
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,792
920
I don't get this problem and why the answer is what the book states that it should be:

If [tex]f(x)=\sqrt{x^{2}}[/tex] then f(x) can also be expressed as: l x l

The answer I chose was simply x , but I don't know why it is wrong.
Already answered but, in particular, suppose x= -3. Then x2= 9. [itex]\sqrt{9}= 3[/itex], not -3 so [itex]\sqrt{x^2}[/itex] is NOT x!

Also, I'm perplexed about this problem:

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} (\frac{3x^{2}+4x-5}{6x^{2}+3x+1})[/tex]

How do you solve this algebraically/numerically? I've tried graphing it on my calculator and I can clearly see that it approached .5 but how come when I put infinity into x in the table it f(x) shows up as 1?? Weird..
You DON'T "put infinity into x"- the function is only defined for x real and "infinity" is NOT a real number. Since we know that [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} 1/x= 0[/itex], try dividing both numerator and denominator by x2: we now have
[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\frac{3+ \frac{4}{x}-\frac{5}{x^2}}{6+ \frac{3}{x}+ \frac{1}{x^2}}[/tex]
For x very very large, those fractions in the numerator and denominator are very very small- they go to 0. So what does the whole thing go to?
 
  • #6
169
0
Table? What table?

This is one of the standard examples in your calculus book: when you have rational functions (or rational function-like things), and you want to analyze them "at" infinity, you should divide the numerator and denominator by the highest power of your variable that appears in the expression.
Oh, I'm not in calculus yet so I didn't know. So what if the expression was [tex]\frac{x^{3}}{x^{2}}[/tex], you would have to divide both numerator and denominator by x^3?
 
  • #7
169
0
Already answered but, in particular, suppose x= -3. Then x2= 9. [itex]\sqrt{9}= 3[/itex], not -3 so [itex]\sqrt{x^2}[/itex] is NOT x!


You DON'T "put infinity into x"- the function is only defined for x real and "infinity" is NOT a real number. Since we know that [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} 1/x= 0[/itex], try dividing both numerator and denominator by x2: we now have
[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\frac{3+ \frac{4}{x}-\frac{5}{x^2}}{6+ \frac{3}{x}+ \frac{1}{x^2}}[/tex]
For x very very large, those fractions in the numerator and denominator are very very small- they go to 0. So what does the whole thing go to?
Okay I see, you divided by x^2 so that you can make some numbers equal zero. 3/6= 1/2
 
  • #8
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,916
17
Oh, I'm not in calculus yet so I didn't know. So what if the expression was [tex]\frac{x^{3}}{x^{2}}[/tex], you would have to divide both numerator and denominator by x^3?
Yep. And then since the numerator goes to 1 and the denominator goes to 0, you learn that this fraction has no limit!
 
  • #9
169
0
Yep. And then since the numerator goes to 1 and the denominator goes to 0, you learn that this fraction has no limit!
Ooo, okay I get it now. Thanks guys :smile:
 
  • #10
1,707
5
ehh it should really be done using l'hospitale but you're not there yet
 
  • #11
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,916
17
ehh it should really be done using l'hospitale but you're not there yet
Why do you think that? The method I described is perfectly rigorous.
 
  • #12
symbolipoint
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Gold Member
5,778
996
Just a comment: about that polynomial rational limit expression, you will learn about these in SOME Precalculus-Elementary Functions courses, but not in others -------- depends where you attend.
 
  • #13
1,056
0
Originally Posted by ice109
ehh it should really be done using l'hospitale but you're not there yet

Hurky: Why do you think that? The method I described is perfectly rigorous.


Of course, and another way to look at it is to realize that the leading term will dominate in a polynominal, so all that matters is 3X^2/6X^2, which goes to 1/2. This may not appear very rigorous, but it can be seen immediately.
 
  • #14
1,707
5
Why do you think that? The method I described is perfectly rigorous.
honestly i don't know the rigor behind the division, it seems a little arbitrary. though i do think you could probably tell me.
 
  • #15
chroot
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
10,226
34
What's not rigorous about multiplying the top and bottom of a fraction by the same thing?

You're just multiplying the fraction by, e.g.

[itex]\frac{1/x^2}{1/x^2}[/itex]

- Warren
 

Related Threads for: Square roots and square

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
Top