Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I was wondering if anyone could explain how Srednicki gets to his eqn 26.7:

[tex] \tilde{dk_1}\tilde{dk_2} \sim (\omega^{d-3}_{1}d\omega_1) (\omega^{d-3}_{2}d\omega_2)(sin^{d-3}\theta d\theta) [/tex]

I thought this would be to do with transforming into some kind of d-dimensional polar coords so I start as:

[tex] \tilde{dk_1}\tilde{dk_2}=\frac{d^{d-1}k_1}{(2\pi)^{d-1}2\omega_{1}}\frac{d^{d-1}k_2}{(2\pi)^{d-1}2\omega_{2}}=\frac{\vec{k_1}^{d-2}d\vec{k_1}d\Omega_{d-2}\vec{k_2}^{d-2}d\vec{k_2}d\Omega_{d-2}}{(2\pi)^{d-1}2\omega_{1}(2\pi)^{d-1}2\omega_{2} } [/tex]

Now since he's working in the massless limit [tex] \omega_{1,2}=\vec{k}_{1,2} [/tex]

[tex] \tilde{dk_1}\tilde{dk_2}=\frac{\omega^{d-3}_{1}d\omega_{1}d\Omega_{d-2}\omega^{d-3}_{2}d\omega_{2}\Omega_{d-2}}{4(2\pi)^{d-1}(2\pi)^{d-1} } [/tex]

[tex] \tilde{dk_1}\tilde{dk_2}=(\omega^{d-3}_{1}d\omega_{1})(\omega^{d-3}_{2}d\omega_{2}) \frac{d\Omega_{d-2}d\Omega_{d-2}}{4(2\pi)^{d-1}(2\pi)^{d-1}} [/tex]

Which looks quite similar to what he has, but not there yet. I'm guessing that the solid angle must go something like

[tex] d\Omega_{d-2}=sin^{d-3}d\theta \times d\phi_{1}d\phi_{2}... [/tex]

Which probably cancels out a few [tex]\pi[/tex]'s but then why doesnt he have two lot's of the sin term?

Thanks for any help on this

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Srednicki CH26

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**