Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Srednicki equation 5.10

  1. Mar 23, 2010 #1
    In equation 5.10, second line srednicki uses the same definition as eq 5.6, while 5.6 is time independent [tex]a_1^{\dagger}(k)[/tex] and in 5.10 we have to use the new time dependent [tex]a_1^{\dagger}(t)[/tex] . Why dont we have a new [tex]a_1^{\dagger}(t)[/tex], which say explicitly depends on t ?

    I will be glad if someone can explain :)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 23, 2010 #2
    just before eq 5-8:

    One complication is that a†(k) will no longer be time independent, and so a†1, eq. (5.6),
    becomes time dependent as well.
     
  4. Mar 23, 2010 #3
    thankyou for pointing out, I should read between the lines..
     
  5. Mar 23, 2010 #4
    It will be very kind if you can also explain how to understand paragraph starting with "We would like ........ is not zero" on page 39, after equation 5.17
     
  6. Mar 23, 2010 #5
    try to work it out, i have no idea where you are stuck
     
  7. Mar 25, 2010 #6
    I am working on it, thanks for you help :)
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook