I was wondering: why is the SM always written with a Lagrangian? Couldn't you just as well write it with a Hamiltonian? The way I understand, the Lagrangian gives me the kinetic energy minus the potential energy (basically a measure for the "free energy", though not in the thermodynamical sense), while the Hamiltonian gives me the total energy of the system. Are these quantities interchangable, or is it really neccecary to write the SM in terms of a Lagrangian?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Standard Model: Lagrangian vs. Hamiltonian

Loading...

Similar Threads - Standard Model Lagrangian | Date |
---|---|

A My T-shirt and the Standard Model | Dec 11, 2017 |

A Deducing decay processes and Feynman diagrams using Lagrangian and conservation laws | Feb 18, 2017 |

I Local Gauge invariance | Sep 13, 2016 |

Lagrangian of Standard Model Deduction | May 23, 2015 |

Standard model lagrangian? | Jul 14, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**