- #1

- 43

- 0

4m, 2.5m, 1.5m, or 67cm.

2L/n=lamda

I said 2.5m because this does not give an natural number solution to the formula. Is this correct?

- Thread starter jan2905
- Start date

- #1

- 43

- 0

4m, 2.5m, 1.5m, or 67cm.

2L/n=lamda

I said 2.5m because this does not give an natural number solution to the formula. Is this correct?

- #2

LowlyPion

Homework Helper

- 3,090

- 4

Correct. It would not be a fundamental evenly divisible into the length.

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 739

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K