In order to apply perturbation theory to the ψ[itex]_{200}[/itex] and ψ[itex]_{210}[/itex] states, we have to solve the matrix eigenvalue equation.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Ux=λx where U is the matrix of the matrix elements of H[itex]_{1}[/itex]= eEz between these states.

Please see the matrix in attachment 1.

where <2,0,0|z|2,1,0>=<2,1,0|z|2,0,0>=3a[itex]_{o}[/itex]

Solving this matrix we get, λ[itex]_{1}[/itex]=3ea[itex]_{o}[/itex]|E| and λ[itex]_{2}[/itex]= -3ea[itex]_{o}[/itex]|E|

Then we find eigenvectors to get x[itex]_{1}[/itex] =(1/√2 1/√2)[itex]^{T}[/itex] and x[itex]_{2}[/itex]= (1/√2 -1/√2)[itex]^{T}[/itex]

**** They finally said that ψ[itex]_{1}[/itex] = (ψ[itex]_{200}[/itex] + ψ[itex]_{210}[/itex])/√2

and ψ[itex]_{2}[/itex] = (ψ[itex]_{200}[/itex] - ψ[itex]_{210}[/itex])/√2

How did they get this? How did they combine ψ[itex]_{1}[/itex] and ψ[itex]_{2}[/itex] as follows? It is just the linear combination that I don't get. Thank you.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Stark Effect

Loading...

Similar Threads - Stark Effect | Date |
---|---|

A Stark effect - theory vs experiment? | Sep 14, 2016 |

Wigner-Eckart theorem in Stark effect | Dec 28, 2014 |

Understanding the quadratic Stark effect | Mar 20, 2011 |

Calculating the Stark Effect (Spectral line splitting)? | Sep 18, 2009 |

Stark Effect using first order variation theory. | Jul 6, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**