Starry night

  • Thread starter lwymarie
  • Start date
89
1
The stars in the sky are all emitting their own light. The light is reflected for infinitely many times and part of the light energy will be stored in objects. But why is the sky so dark? Why is it not bright?
 

Danger

Gold Member
9,564
244
lwymarie said:
The stars in the sky are all emitting their own light. The light is reflected for infinitely many times and part of the light energy will be stored in objects. But why is the sky so dark? Why is it not bright?
You appear to be a poet by nature, as opposed to a scientist. Light energy is unfortunately not 'stored' in objects. It is either absorbed or refracted (up to the point of being reflected).
 
2,208
1
lwymarie said:
The stars in the sky are all emitting their own light. The light is reflected for infinitely many times and part of the light energy will be stored in objects. But why is the sky so dark? Why is it not bright?
Can you see a light bulb from a mile away? How about 100000000000000000000000000000000000 miles?
 

brewnog

Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,701
7
The sky is dark because it is empty, and there is nothing for the light to reflect off.
 

SGT

I think lwymarie refers to Olbers paradox.
 

krab

Science Advisor
896
1
lwymarie said:
The stars in the sky are all emitting their own light. The light is reflected for infinitely many times and part of the light energy will be stored in objects. But why is the sky so dark? Why is it not bright?
Excellent question, first asked by Kepler 400 years ago! Look up SGT's link.
 
123
0
The sky isn't all bright because, for whatever reason, the more distant a light source the more red shifted is its light. When we check low enought frequencies, we even find the light shifted into the radio frequencies.
 
89
1
Yes yes I was referring to the Olbers' Paradox. However I do not remember the details so I describe what I still remember about the paradox and see if some goodies can explain to me ;)
Thx a lot =]
 

Danger

Gold Member
9,564
244
Olbers' paradox is based upon the false impression of an infinite universe. It supposes that everything has always existed. If such were true, then the sky would be uniformly bright. No matter in which way you look, there would be a star. The Big Bang eliminates that concept, because you can only look as far in space as you can look back in time. The 45 billion years or so that has elapsed since then is not long enough for sufficient star formation to cause infinite light creation. Moreover, the total energy content of the universe precludes the possibility of it ever happening.
 

DaveC426913

Gold Member
18,244
1,846
Danger said:
...you can only look as far in space as you can look back in time. The 45 billion years or so that has elapsed since then...
??? 45 billion? Did I miss an issue of Sci Am? 13 billion at last count.
 

Danger

Gold Member
9,564
244
DaveC426913 said:
??? 45 billion? Did I miss an issue of Sci Am? 13 billion at last count.
:redface: I usually proof-read these things better, but I was flat-out exhausted when I wrote that. It was supposed to say 15, which is a based upon one study that suggested that it might be as old as 20 billion years. Sorry, and thanks for catching it.
 

Related Threads for: Starry night

  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
881
  • Posted
Replies
6
Views
661
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • Posted
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
5K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top