Starship (/Super Heavy) testing: Mk1 stacked, 20 km flight this year

In summary, Starship is a revolutionary two-stage rocket that is expected to revolutionize spaceflight. It is larger than Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy and has the ability to refuel in orbit.
  • #1
37,123
13,964
Previously discussed in the "Space Stuff" thread but this is a long-term project.

What is Starship?
SpaceX is working on a fully reusable two-stage rocket to replace the partially reusable Falcon 9/Falcon Heavy. It is the largest rocket that made it beyond the concept phase so far; the payload will be 100-150 tonnes to low Earth orbit. Both stages are expected to be fully and rapidly reusable, a bit like aircraft, as this can reduce launch cost massively. The lower stage is called Super Heavy, the upper stage is called Starship, the combination doesn't have an official name. Starship is the revolutionary part of it. It will come in several versions - a satellite deployment version, a tanker version (to refuel other Starships in orbit) and at least one passenger version. The ability to refuel in orbit gives it an unprecedented capability for flights leaving Earth. The same 100-150 tonnes can be launched to low Earth orbit can also be launched to the Moon or Mars.
The early business plan is the satellite deployment - cheaper than Falcon 9 and with a larger payload than Falcon Heavy it can take over all its flights. As long-term goal it is planned to fly humans to Mars, and maybe even beyond. It could also enable super-fast Earth to Earth transportation - flights would be under an hour where airplanes need up to ~20.

Current status
In early 2019 SpaceX built a subscale prototype called Starhopper. It has the same diameter but not the same height. It made first hops in April - held down with tethers, its maximum height was about 1 m.
In parallel SpaceX is constructing two full-scale Starship prototypes with by two teams who compete/cooperate.
Construction of Super Heavy is expected to start in about 3 months (August). By that time the Starship vehicles should have their outer structure finished.

Update September 2019: The first full-scale prototype (Mk1) in Texas is nearing completion. Super Heavy construction as a big rocket has not started yet but many rings have been prepared that will be combined to become the hull of Super Heavy.

Test plan
SpaceX is currently preparing for untethered hops of Starhopper. The first of them is expected to be about 20 m, roughly its own height, and could happen next week. It will be done with just one Raptor engine installed. Later hops will use three engines and be up to 5 km high, this is the limit of the permission SpaceX got for hops there. This is a bit similar to the Grasshopper tests that lead to the reusable boosters of Falcon 9.
The full-scale prototypes are expected to make high-altitude/high-velocity flights later this year. Super Heavy will follow later and combined orbital flights were announced for 2020.

Update September 2019: Starhopper was retired after a 150 m flight. A 20 km flight of a full-scale prototype is planned for October.

------

If this works remotely as expected it will revolutionize spaceflight, crewed and uncrewed. Just plugging in numbers from SpaceX you might be able to buy a short trip to space for $5000. They can get a very long queue of customers. The big unknown is the safety: Can the system go from the ~2-5% failure rate of current rockets to a value close to the ~0.0002% of modern aircraft?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Klystron, DEvens, Buzz Bloom and 3 others
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The testing of the Starship originally scheduled for this week has been pushed back to next week starting June 11. https://www.themonitor.com/2019/06/02/spacex-testing-pushed-back/
 
  • #3
Apparently the test has been put off again until June 17 through June 19. One source of this information is the Cameron County TX http://www.co.cameron.tx.us/public_services/hwy_4_and_boca_chica_beach_closures.phparound the SpaceX test facitlity.
 
  • #4
Apparently they had some engine damage. Both a presentation planned for June 20 and the first flight might shift to July.



Edit: NET July confirmed

 
Last edited:
  • #5
While flight tests of the hopper get delayed due to engine issues (see the edit in the previous post) work on the orbital prototypes makes progress.

This is the status on the East Coast (from here):

D9r8iV_X4AAMglH.jpg


View from a different angle

This looks close to the renderings already.
The full Starship height is about 4 times the height of the nose section (plus feet). The larger piece might be twice the height of the nose, the section next to it is a bit below that, so we are at ~2.5 out of 4 or so, a bit more than half of the outer structure is done.
The hexagonal object to the left of the cylindrical section could be the start of the engine section.Edit: Boca Chica (Texas) site seems to be near completion of the hull. Here is an overview, the three green rings are still missing.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
No road closures notices around South Padre Island or FAA Notices to Airmen posted(NOTSAM)for the near future. Starhopper test awaiting raptor engine test first per https://www.spadre.com/
 
  • #10
The test schedule changed a bit - only a static fire (using the engine while standing on the ground) on Tuesday, hop on Wednesday. Based on the video of the static fire the hop might be delayed - significantly.

The video starts playing seconds before the static fire test that seemed to work normally. But watch what happens 51:15...

No official news yet.

Edit: Spacecraft looks fine, no visible damage at least. Probably rapid combustion of fuel that was vented after the test.

Edit2: No flight tests this week, new schedule to be determined.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
The fire from the static event was a fuel leak that didn't affect the main test; it has been fixed.

One hop attempt got aborted today (but there is a bit of fire around), maybe another attempt tomorrow. Video of the short Raptor burn

Unlike orbital launches these hop tests can be done on short notice, and unlikely launches of Falcon 9 which have become routine this is a completely new machine, so there are many unknowns involved.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Next test is tentatively scheduled for 11 pm EST July 25.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
  • #13
It happened!
Success.

Elon Musk: "200 m hop in a week or so"





Edit: Video from below the hopper, looking at the engine and the ground:

 
Last edited:
  • #15
Well, what else could it be. We know this test is planned and that date is the next road closure.
I'm waiting for the promised update on the design and progress.

They installed the bottom of the first main tank in the orbital prototype in Texas: Here is an image.

Edit: Annotated aerial view of the Texas site
 
Last edited:
  • #16
NASA and SpaceX released a 250-page "Draft Environmental Assessment for the SpaceX Starship and Super Heavy Launch Vehicle at Kennedy Space Center (KSC)" (direct link to PDF).

Various people have read various parts and there is a lot of discussion at nasaspaceflight.com.
Key points in my opinion:
  • The launch pad will be near the current Falcon 9 pad LC-39A, but separate
  • A crane will put the Super Heavy booster onto the launch pad and then lift Starship on top of it.
  • Super Heavy will land on a barge at least 30 km off-shore. Before it can launch again it has to be shipped to a landing site near the launch site. Makes reuse a bit slower. In the future it might land near the launch site.
  • Starship will land close to the launch pad.
  • Up to 24 launches per year based on this environmental impact assessment. This does not include launches from Texas.
  • The Super Heavy flight profile might look similar to the Falcon 9 boosters. The maximal height is ~140 km.

Edit: Starship updates August 24
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Still set to launch at 11 pm tonight Aug 16. as of 10:20 am
 
  • #18
They didn't get FAA approval in time. No new date yet.

 
  • Informative
Likes hutchphd
  • #19
Wondering about the launch time I posted since I did not see a FAA Notice to airman (NOTSAM).
 
  • #20
The NOTAM was there but they didn't get the permission to fly. New road closures are now Wednesday to Friday next week. Not an FAA permission, but SpaceX seems confident to get it by then.

 
  • #21
150 meter hop as early as in 2 minutes (but could launch at any point in the next hours, as it is an experimental flight):



Commentary and alternative view here:

Edit: SUCCESS!

This should be the heaviest vehicle ever to land vertically, by the way (same as for the previous hop).
 
  • #22
Very nice coverage of a solid engineering prototype test. Congratulations to SpaceX!
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
  • #23
Musk on Twitter:
Aiming for 20km flight in Oct & orbit attempt shortly thereafter. Starship update will be on Sept 28th, anniversary of SpaceX reaching orbit. Starship Mk 1 will be fully assembled by that time.
Mk 1 is the full-scale prototype produced in Florida Texas. While these time estimates are usually too optimistic* it will still mean an orbital flight before mid 2020 unless something goes horribly wrong. From welding together some steel to orbit in 1-1.5 years.

*sometimes they are spot on. In 2014 he estimated test flights in 5 to 6 years.

SpaceX is thinking about an 18 meter diameter version - four times the area, probably more than four times the payload. But that is quite far into the future.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jackwhirl
  • #24
Video of the update

Some notes I took:

Starship design:
  • Mk1 in Texas has a mass of 200 tonnes, goal is 120 tonnes (maybe even 110). 150 t payload to low Earth orbit, typical return payload 50 t.
  • Heat shield concept: Mainly stainless steel, some ceramic tiles in areas of maximum heat
  • 6 landing legs, independent of the fins.
  • Super Heavy has 37 raptor engines, a nice symmetric layout plus a center engine.
  • The pressurized volume is still 1000 m3, similar to the ISS. Imagine a space station that can land and fly back to space for little more than fuel costs.
Plans:
  • 20 km altitude flight of Mk 1 "in 1-2 months". The next flight after that might directly go to orbit, but not with Mk 1 or 2. Musk first suggested Mk 3 (to start construction in Texas in 1 month) but later said Mk 4 or Mk 5 will be the first to reach orbit. As estimate for completion dates he said 3 months for Mk 3, 4-5 months for Mk 4. Super Heavy construction (one in Florida/Texas each) would be built after Mk 4. Going to orbit "in 6 months" or so. Construction of the Raptor engines might be the bottleneck, they need 37 for a booster.
  • Crewed flights quickly after that, "next year". How: Fly often to demonstrate reliability. The life support system seems to be in an advanced stage already. He discussed the option of having 10 flights in 10 days. The booster is designed for even faster turnaround.
  • SpaceX plans to land "a couple of ships" on Mars before sending a crew there.
  • Starship/Super Heavy will launch both from Florida (where a launch pad is in preparation) and Texas (where they need to build a new one, the concrete pad they have now can only support Starship alone). This also applies to crew.
  • They work on fuel production from atmospheric CO2 and water. This is necessary on Mars but also interesting on Earth. It could make the rocket fully CO2 neutral.
  • What has been suspected for a long time: Musk thinks about bringing a boring machine to Moon or Mars (he started a tunneling company a while ago).
Timelines are expected to shift a lot, of course.
 
  • Like
Likes Imager, OmCheeto, berkeman and 1 other person
  • #25
Wow, that’s a lot of information. Definitely one of the most revolutionary things in the aerospace industry! This is a picture of the Starship in production
A6276E37-5583-494D-BCC5-F7B5BD6F4A1F.jpeg
wait, what is a typical return payload? Does it means the payload it can deorbit within its cargo bay?
 
  • #26
It will typically launch things to space. A larger landing mass means more stress for the heat shield and more fuel needed to land.
 
  • #27
Xforce said:
Wow, that’s a lot of information. Definitely one of the most revolutionary things in the aerospace industry! This is a picture of the Starship in productionView attachment 250805 wait, what is a typical return payload? Does it means the payload it can deorbit within its cargo bay?
Just a note that Elon noticed an error on this slide during the presentation @ 14:20. The dry mass for the production Starship will be about 120 tons, not the 85 tons listed. There may be a path to 110 tons. Mk1 is closer to 200 tons.
 
  • #28
Xforce said:
Wow, that’s a lot of information. Definitely one of the most revolutionary things in the aerospace industry! This is a picture of the Starship in production wait, what is a typical return payload? Does it means the payload it can deorbit within its cargo bay?

I think it is just the weight of the reusable bit i.e. the Super Heavy. 100 tons to orbit, 50 returns, total 150.

Cheers
 
  • #29
cosmik debris said:
I think it is just the weight of the reusable bit i.e. the Super Heavy. 100 tons to orbit, 50 returns, total 150.

Cheers
This sounds more confusing... does it mean bring 100 tons to orbit and return 50 tons? With a total of 100-50=50 tons?
Or does it means bring 100 to orbit on expendable mode, and 50 on reusable mode? Well that’s weak
Plus it will be an awful idea to launch a fully reusable vehicle in a expendable way even at end of its life, because Starship is huge and will add a lot of space junk
 
  • #30
cosmik debris said:
I think it is just the weight of the reusable bit i.e. the Super Heavy. 100 tons to orbit, 50 returns, total 150.

Cheers
This has nothing to do with Super Heavy. The 150 tonnes are payload of Starship to orbit. Both Super Heavy and Starship are reusable. It could be that Starship can't land with 150 tonnes of payload, but that is not a big deal - rockets mainly deliver things to space, the other direction is less common.

The expendable payload of Starship will be much higher, but it means throwing away the spacecraft , or even spacecraft and booster - SpaceX doesn't expect to do that ever.
 
  • #31
Road closures Oct 23 to 25 - but it sounds like a simple static fire test (rocket stays on the ground), otherwise they would probably need more paperwork.
 

1. What is the purpose of the "Starship (/Super Heavy) testing: Mk1 stacked, 20 km flight this year"?

The purpose of this testing is to demonstrate the capabilities of the Starship and Super Heavy rocket system, specifically the Mk1 prototype, by conducting a 20 km flight test. This will provide valuable data and insights for the development and improvement of the Starship for future missions.

2. When will the testing take place?

The testing is scheduled to take place sometime this year, although an exact date has not been announced yet. The SpaceX team is currently working towards completing the necessary preparations and safety checks before the flight can be conducted.

3. What is the significance of the 20 km flight?

The 20 km flight is a significant milestone for the Starship development as it will be the highest altitude test flight for the prototype. This will allow the team to test various systems and technologies at a higher altitude and closer to the conditions of space.

4. What are the potential risks of the testing?

As with any rocket testing, there are always potential risks involved. The main risk for this particular test is the possibility of a failure during the flight, which could lead to the loss of the prototype. However, SpaceX has a rigorous testing and safety protocol in place to minimize these risks as much as possible.

5. What are the expected outcomes of the testing?

The testing is expected to provide valuable data and insights for the development and improvement of the Starship system. This includes testing the aerodynamics, control systems, and engines of the rocket at a higher altitude. It will also help validate the design and capabilities of the Starship for future missions, such as sending humans to Mars.

Similar threads

  • Aerospace Engineering
3
Replies
77
Views
9K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • Aerospace Engineering
7
Replies
238
Views
13K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
6
Replies
183
Views
11K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Aerospace Engineering
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
Back
Top