- #1
Elwin.Martin
- 207
- 0
I'm going to attempt to start a beginner GR book since we're covering it in Modern Physics and I've been covering the material up a notch so far (I did the SR by reading Spacetime Physics by Taylor and Wheeler & I've already read Griffith's for the Qmech section etc.) I don't intend to finish an entire GR text in the month or so we're spending on GR, but I think I could make some solid progress. My professor said (a bit hyperbolically) that all the physicists I'd talk to would recommend Schutz as an introduction, and when I brought up Hartle and we hasn't familiar with it. He hasn't taught GR in a long time so I figured I'd get a second opinion so to speak from the forum. I read through a number of older posts on GR book recommendations and I've come down to two choices for the level I think I'm at mathematically and in terms of physics background, but I'm not really sure what the merits of each book are. I suppose there's a third option I've been glancing at, but not taking seriously as well.
My two options that I'm considering are Hartle and Schutz, but I'm not really sure which of the two I should go with. I've glanced at Ohanian, but I wasn't a huge fan of his the first time I opened his Electrodynamics book. After looking at it again though, I'm considering his GR book.
What would be the differences between the books I'm looking at? I'm just looking for major differences in writing style and material covered, but I'd like a surprise as far as problem difficulty goes. I don't want to pysch myself out thinking a book will have really difficult problems, though I know I'm going to have to work on this.
Thanks for your help with this!
**further background** I've covered Calc I-Diff Eqs and I'm taking Group Theory this semester (It's an intro Abstract course, but it's being taught by a heavily biased group theorist :) )
My two options that I'm considering are Hartle and Schutz, but I'm not really sure which of the two I should go with. I've glanced at Ohanian, but I wasn't a huge fan of his the first time I opened his Electrodynamics book. After looking at it again though, I'm considering his GR book.
What would be the differences between the books I'm looking at? I'm just looking for major differences in writing style and material covered, but I'd like a surprise as far as problem difficulty goes. I don't want to pysch myself out thinking a book will have really difficult problems, though I know I'm going to have to work on this.
Thanks for your help with this!
**further background** I've covered Calc I-Diff Eqs and I'm taking Group Theory this semester (It's an intro Abstract course, but it's being taught by a heavily biased group theorist :) )