- #1

- 734

- 0

then why does w(adiabatic)=U is a state function?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter asdf1
- Start date

- #1

- 734

- 0

then why does w(adiabatic)=U is a state function?

- #2

- #3

- 10

- 1

[tex]dF = P(x,y)dx + Q(x,y)dy[/tex]

By the commutation of second order partial derivatives, we find that if

[tex]\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}[/tex]

then the quantity

[tex] Pdx + Qdy [/tex]

is an exact differential.

Now, say that x and y are also functions of some variables s and t. It may be true that dx = Ads + Bdt is not an exact differential. Likewise, dy = Cds + Ddt may also be inexact. However, if we add them together we can get an expression

[tex] Pdx + Qdy [/tex]

that is exact (that is, Pdx + Qdy = dF).

This is what's going on when one discusses the first law of thermodynamics:

[tex] dE = dQ + dW [/tex]

dE is an exact differential. dQ and dW are inexact, but their sum is exact. By the way, exact differentials are related to

Hope this helps!

- #4

- 734

- 0

but during an adiabatic process, w=U, so how are you supposed to know whether w and U are or aren't state functions?

- #5

LeonhardEuler

Gold Member

- 859

- 1

- #6

- 734

- 0

but is kinda seems like in an adiabatic function, work will then become a state function too...

- #7

- 24

- 0

U = Q + W

You can get the same value for U for many different combinations of Q and W. In this special case, Q = 0 so U = W.

- #8

- 147

- 1

- #9

LeonhardEuler

Gold Member

- 859

- 1

- #10

- 734

- 0

so in a adiabatic process, work isn't a state function?

- #11

- 7

- 0

This means the work done will only depend on the endpoints of the path -- as long as we are only considering paths along which dq = 0.

- #12

- 734

- 0

i see... thanks! :)

Share: