Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

State Tomography?

  1. Oct 27, 2008 #1
    I don't know where this question belongs:

    Given many pairs of [tex]\left|\Psi\right>[/tex] and [tex]U\left|\Psi\right>[/tex], for some unitary U, is it possible to identify U without completely determining the two states independently? I mean what is the least possible number of pairs needed (to be x% certain), and is it less than simply determining the two states?
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 28, 2008 #2
    Is there even enough information to determine a general U?
  4. Oct 30, 2008 #3
  5. Nov 1, 2008 #4
    No, there's not enough info to determine U from what you propose: even if you know |psi> and U|\psi, you really know only one column vector of U, not the whole U (take |\psi> as your first basis vector in Hilbert space)
  6. Nov 1, 2008 #5
    But for a specific U, like a permutation?
  7. Nov 1, 2008 #6
    Same answer, you only learn one column of the matrix.
  8. Nov 1, 2008 #7
    What if [itex]\left|\Psi\right>[/itex] were a tensor state of n qubits?
  9. Nov 1, 2008 #8
    If the tensor product consists of many different qubit states, and if the big U is a tensor product of identical U_2s on each qubit, then of course you can learn everything about U_2.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: State Tomography?
  1. Spin States (Replies: 9)

  2. Pointer states (Replies: 4)

  3. Preparing the state (Replies: 38)