- #1

- 241

- 9

g

^{cd}g

_{ac}(dv

^{a}/ds) becomes (dv

^{d}/ds)

I seems to me that that only works if the metric matrix is diagonal.

(1) Is that correct?

(2) If so, that doesn't seem to be a legitimate limitation on the property of geodesics??

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter exmarine
- Start date

- #1

- 241

- 9

g

I seems to me that that only works if the metric matrix is diagonal.

(1) Is that correct?

(2) If so, that doesn't seem to be a legitimate limitation on the property of geodesics??

- #2

WannabeNewton

Science Advisor

- 5,815

- 543

(1) Is that correct?

No. ##g^{cd}g_{ac} = \delta^{d}{}{}_{a}## by definition of the inverse of any metric tensor, hence the desired result.

- #3

- 241

- 9

PS. Must the metric matrix always be symmetric? For example, a skew-symmetric matrix can produce the same ds^2 interval as a diagonal. Just curious.

- #4

Nugatory

Mentor

- 13,839

- 7,233

Must the metric matrix always be symmetric? For example, a skew-symmetric matrix can produce the same ds^2 interval as a diagonal. Just curious.

It gives you the same ##ds^2## as some diagonal matrix, but it won't work for calculating the inner product of two different vectors.

- #5

Matterwave

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 3,966

- 327

PS. Must the metric matrix always be symmetric? For example, a skew-symmetric matrix can produce the same ds^2 interval as a diagonal. Just curious.

A metric is, by definition, symmetric. :)

- #6

PeterDonis

Mentor

- 37,733

- 15,473

it won't work for calculating the inner product of two different vectors.

To expand on this just a bit, the metric must be symmetric because the inner product is commutative; ##g(a, b) = g(b, a)## for any two vectors ##a## and ##b##. If you write this out in components, you get that ##g## must be a symmetric matrix.

Share: