Beyond the basics (mean, variance, distributions, simple test, regression, ...) statistics looks like a huge mess -to me- .(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Any method has typically 10 variants and can be 'colored' in 10 flavors,

not to mention technicalities like missing data handling, binary data, ... and people's names

I need to think a long time before I understand the main point of a method (say the bartlett test in a PCA).

I never feel confident for "the details and the options".

Many things never get translated in simple words.

Mathematical descriptions are not (easily) available or are (practically) unreadable.

Sometimes I have the feeling that a "huge monte carlo" point of view could help to simplify the understanding.

For example, a statistical test could be implemented by a "monte carlo" method. If computers had a huge computing power, recourse to specific tests (hard to develop, get and understand) would be useless.

At least, this could be a language to express a "statistical problem".

Could some of you give me some related ideas, papers or web sites?

I am equally interrested by nicely-written material, organized references, unification attempts.

I would like to see the forest, not the trees.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Statistics looks so difficult, no way to simplify ?

Loading...

Similar Threads for Statistics looks difficult | Date |
---|---|

I Small Reduced Chi Squared interpretation | Apr 5, 2018 |

B The Drunkard's Walk: A Discussion of the Text | Mar 8, 2018 |

A Interpreting Chi Squared ... backward | Feb 11, 2018 |

I R-squared statistic for goodness-of-fit | Nov 28, 2017 |

Looking for a statistics course | May 24, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**