1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Steps btw 2 equ. goes wrong

  1. Oct 31, 2004 #1


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    My classical mechanics textbook (Symon) gives two equations. So I try to do the calculations that lead from one to the other but there's something that doesn't work. Tell me what I'm doing wrong please.

    We start from

    [tex]\sum_{k=1}^N (\mathbf{r}_k-\mathbf{r}_Q)\times \mathbf{F}^i_k - m_k(\mathbf{r}_k-\mathbf{r}_Q)\times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k[/tex]

    and want to get to

    [tex]\sum_{k=1}^N (\mathbf{r}_k-\mathbf{r}_Q)\times \mathbf{F}^i_k - M(\mathbf{R}-\mathbf{r}_Q)\times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k[/tex]


    [tex]M\mathbf{R} = \sum_{k=1}^N m_k \mathbf{r}_k[/tex]

    I'm not sure if the [itex]-M(\mathbf{R}-\mathbf{r}_Q)\times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k[/itex] term is included in the sum or not but in either case, it doesn't make sense to me.

    Here are the steps I made:

    [tex]=\sum_{k=1}^N (\mathbf{r}_k-\mathbf{r}_Q)\times \mathbf{F}^i_k -\sum_{k=1}^N m_k(\mathbf{r}_k-\mathbf{r}_Q)\times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k[/tex]

    Now let's work on the second sum; we should get [itex]M(\mathbf{R}-\mathbf{r}_Q)\times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k[/tex] (either with or without the sum sign before)

    [tex]\sum_{k=1}^N m_k(\mathbf{r}_k-\mathbf{r}_Q)\times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k
    = \sum_{k=1}^N m_k\mathbf{r}_k \times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k -\mathbf{r}_Q \times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k
    = \sum_{k=1}^N m_k\mathbf{r}_k \times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k -\sum_{k=1}^N \mathbf{r}_Q \times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k
    =\left[ \sum_{k=1}^N m_k\mathbf{r}_k - \sum_{k=1}^N \mathbf{r}_Q\right] \times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k[/tex]
    [tex] = M\left[ \mathbf{R} - \sum_{k=1}^N \mathbf{r}_Q \right] \times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k[/tex]

    And this is when it doesn't make sense because [itex]\sum_{k=1}^N \mathbf{r}_Q = N \mathbf{r}_Q[/itex] and there is no N in the final equation from the book. This is if the second term is NOT included in the sum. If it IS, then it doesn't make more sense because it would mean the second term is

    [tex]\sum_{k=1}^N M( \mathbf{R} - \mathbf{r}_Q ) \times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k
    = M\left[ \sum_{k=1}^N\mathbf{R} - \sum_{k=1}^N \mathbf{r}_Q \right] \times \mathbf{\ddot{r}}_k[/tex]

    which isn't what we have either!
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you help with the solution or looking for help too?
Draft saved Draft deleted