STM image quality

  • Thread starter superwolf
  • Start date
  • #1
176
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Any suggestions how I can improve the quality of STM (scanning tunneling microscopy) images? And how can I trace artifacts?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Danger
Gold Member
9,607
245
This isn't a field that I'm familiar with, but my first and only thought on the subject would be some sort of computer enhancement.
 
  • #3
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
35,747
4,510
Any suggestions how I can improve the quality of STM (scanning tunneling microscopy) images? And how can I trace artifacts?
This question is extremely vague because you did not describe what you have, and what kind of "improvement" we are talking about.

STM is a very complicated instrument. I can rattle off a bunch of issues that can easily affect the quality of your image: EM isolation, vibration isolation, the size of the tip, how good is your feedback circuitry, what is your best current/voltage/spatial resolution, etc... etc. Even the type of material can affect how well you can image something, i.e. can it be cleaved in vacuum to reveal a pristine surface?

There are a million things there to deal with, and not enough information to deduce anything.

Zz.
 
  • #4
f95toli
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,998
493
And post-processing is also important, programs like SPIP can make a huge difference to the "image quality" of an STM image, although they can also introduce artifacts if you are not careful.
 

Related Threads on STM image quality

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
933
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Top