Stoke's Theorem

  • Thread starter bodensee9
  • Start date
  • #1
bodensee9
178
0
Hello: I usually think of Stoke's Theorem as:

[tex]\oint F\bullet dr = \int \int curl F \bullet dS[/tex]
where dr is over a curve C and dS is over a surface sigma. But today in class the instructor said that Stoke's Theorem can also be used to change the surface over which one is intergrating, so that if sigma has a well defined boundary, say, C, then the surface integral of function F over sigma = surface integral F over any surface with C as the boundary. A more concrete example, so then say you are integrating some F over a paraboloid z = sqrt(1-x^2-y^2) above the xy plane. So then would it be true that my surface integral over the paraboloid would be the same as if I integrated over the disk formed by x^2+y^2 = 1? Thanks.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
621
Well, Stokes says the two surface integrals are equal to the same line integral. Why shouldn't they be equal?
 
  • #3
bodensee9
178
0
they would be, but I thought then you must have that F is the curl of some other function. So if div F = 0 then it would be true. But would it be true if div F is not zero? Thanks.
 
  • #4
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
621
The version of Stokes I'm thinking of says that the surface integral of curl(F).ds is equal to the line integral of F.dr. It doesn't say require div(F)=0. And it doesn't say anything about the surface integral of F itself, just curl(F).
 

Suggested for: Stoke's Theorem

Replies
4
Views
67
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
177
Replies
1
Views
173
Replies
3
Views
244
Replies
14
Views
374
Replies
2
Views
599
Replies
3
Views
353
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
940
Top