1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Storm Wind Force

  1. Oct 21, 2016 #1
    I was surprised at the number of people thinking they should "ride out the storm" when Hurricane Mathew moved up the coast. They are assuming that because they've been in a cat 1 or 2 that a 3 or 4 is nothing to worry about. I was trying to explain to someone that force is not linier with delta velocity. I had to do some hunting to find a formula. f = A * e * v² where f = force, A = Area, e = mean density of air. v = velocity.
    I used 1.225 kg/m3 for e and assume an area of 1 for simplicity. So Assuming a solid static wall at all velocities I simplified the formula to f = e * v² which, when I plot it appears to follow the curve I'd expect however I've seen other posts here now that make me question the equation I'm using.

    Another post here was looking at force of wind at 100 MPH and was calculating a force of .17 psi and assumed a force of 1.7 psi at 1000 mph. That doean't make sense to me. Pressure shouldn't be directly proportional to velocity. However someone responding said that those were the correct numbers.

    So now I question my equation. I know the numbers I used were metric but I found I found aproximately 2.35 for imperial at between 60º and 70º F.

    So, is the equation I'm using correct? Are the numbers they are getting accurate? Am I missing something in my equation? Actually I would like to plot it in both metric and imperial units.

    Thank you in advance for use of your brain power.

  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 21, 2016 #2

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Where did you get this from?

    Force divided by area is pressure.

    Where? Link? Otherwise how can anyone here evaluate how applicable that post was?
    I'm getting 0.36psi for 100mph - all other things remaining equal. If the air density were halved though...
    ... and how do you know that "someone responding" was correct?

    Note: 1000mph (1610kmph) would be al lot worse than 17 on the Beaufort scale (>222kmph) ... a strength that flattens towns.
    On the saffir-Simpson scale for storms, category 5 (the worst) only needs about 160mph winds, and the record is something like 250mph.
    So it is unclear how anyone can say anything so glibly about 1000mph winds - which I'd hazard would strip the flesh off bone.
    See: https://what-if.xkcd.com/66/

    We have no way to assess the equation ... it looks like it is based on change in momentum: so you imagine that a blob of air mass ##m## hits a wall at speed ##v## and all of it is stopped by the wall in time ##t##, then the force the wall experiences is ##F=mv/t## (rate of change of momentum.)
    If the wall stops over area ##A##, then the mass stopped is ##m = \rho Av T## (##\rho## is the density of the air) which gives you ##F = \rho A v^2## ... so the equation is correct for the model. But how good is the model for storm conditions? Does wind generally just stop dead at a wall? It is almost cerain that something is missing from such a simplistic model.
    The units you use don't matter to the graph - the curve is the same, only the numbers and labels on the axes are different.

    You may want to have a look at:
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2016
  4. Oct 21, 2016 #3
  5. Oct 21, 2016 #4

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    That link is to a pdf of a lecture that seems to be taking an inordinate amount of time to download so I didn't bother.
    Does the reasoning in the lecture match up with what I was speculating?
    "proportional to the square of the speed" is pretty reasonable for a force/pressure law for wind btw ... it's also how terminal velocity gets calculated.

    What I was modelling for you above is the way to assess statements you read online ... you ask a whole bunch of questions and check the statement against other sources.
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2016
  6. Oct 22, 2016 #5
    Thankyou, that really helps a lot. It really helps to have a resource online where one can get help. Thankyou again.
  7. Oct 22, 2016 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    "Degloving" velocities are around 200 mph; that's a rough figure given the broad range of skin texture/tone.
  8. Oct 22, 2016 #7
    Yeah, Simon, think I can figure better ways to die. The only reason I tested to 1000 is to compare the numbers. I really only cared to go to low end of tornado
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted