This isn't a problem out of my book, just something I noticed while *doing* a problem on parallel capacitor plates. The problem gave me an area for each plate (1 m^2)and a desired capacitance (1 F)and prompted me to find the distance between the plates.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

C = q/v (capacitance = charge/potential difference)

v = integration [E*ds] (potential diff = int [electric field * infinitesimal distance])

Here's what I was supposed to be doing:

V = integration [E * ds] from 0 to d, that is Ed. From flux, q/(ε0) = EA, so q = (ε0)EA. C = q/v, therefore C = (ε0)A/d. Plug in A and C and get d.

But I was also thinking:

C = q/v. Plugging in v = kq/d, you get C=d/k or C=4π(ε0)d. Setting the two Cs equal, you get A=4πd^2, which is the surface area of a sphere! What?

I have an idea that it's related to A) an infinitesimally small piece of a sphere being a square B) ignoring fringing, and thus making the situation as though the two plates were shells. Is this right? Plugging in the d that I got (8.854 x 10^-12 m) back into A = 4πr^2 gets me a near-negligible area, which seems to make sense with the dA idea... but I'm not sure how this all plays out mathematically.

Thanks,

Stephanie

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Homework Help: Strange area formula found while equating capacitance formulas for parallel plates

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**