Strange convolution equation

In summary, the conversation discusses an equation involving the convolution of two functions, where one of the functions is a Gaussian pdf. The speaker has tried taking Fourier transforms but encountered difficulties with the solution. They suggest the possibility of casting the problem as an eigenvalue problem. It is noted that the trivial solution is when f(x) = 0, but in this case, f(x) does not equal 0.
  • #1
exmachina
44
0
I've arrived at the following equation involving the convolution of two functions:

[itex]
f(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(t) g(t-x) dt = f(x) \ast g(x)
[/itex]

Where:

[itex]
g(z) = e^{-z^2/2}
[/itex]

In other words, a function convoluted with a Gaussian pdf results in the same function.

I've tried taking Fourier transforms, realizing that the FT of a gaussian results in another Gaussian:

[itex]
F[f(x)] = F[f(x) \ast g(x)] = F[f(x)] \cdot F[g(x)]
[/itex]

But this results in the [itex] F[f(x)] [/itex] cancelling out, leaving me with just:

[itex]
1 = F[g(x)] = e^{-w^2/2}
[/itex]

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Yes that is the trivial solution.

Perhaps this can be casted as an eigenvalue problem - as it seems to imply that the convolution operator (wrt to the gaussian) may have certain eigenvalues and corresponding eigenfunctions f(x) being one of them
 
  • #4
edit - doh - this obviously implies that f(x) must be equal to 0 (no other solution satisfies:

f(x)=f(x)g(x) unless g(x) = 1, which in this case, it isn't)
 
  • #5


I would suggest checking your calculations and making sure that you are using the correct properties and definitions of the Fourier transform. It is possible that there may be a mistake in your calculations that is leading to the cancellation of terms.

Additionally, it is important to note that the convolution of two functions is not always equal to one of the functions. In this case, it seems that the convolution of a Gaussian with itself results in a Gaussian, but this may not always be the case.

Another possibility is to consider using other mathematical tools, such as Laplace transforms or z-transforms, to solve the convolution equation. These may provide a different perspective and potentially lead to a solution.

Lastly, it may also be helpful to consult with a colleague or mentor who has experience with convolution and Fourier transforms to get their insights and suggestions on how to approach this problem. Collaboration and discussion can often lead to a better understanding and resolution of complex equations.
 

1. What is a "strange convolution equation"?

A strange convolution equation is a mathematical equation that describes the relationship between two mathematical functions, where one function is applied to the other, resulting in a new function. The term "strange" refers to the fact that the functions involved may not have a traditional or intuitive relationship.

2. How is a strange convolution equation different from a regular convolution equation?

A regular convolution equation involves standard mathematical functions that have a clear and intuitive relationship, such as multiplication or addition. A strange convolution equation, on the other hand, may involve more complex or non-linear functions that do not have an obvious relationship.

3. What is the purpose of studying strange convolution equations?

Studying strange convolution equations can help scientists and mathematicians better understand complex systems and phenomena, as they often arise in areas such as signal processing, image analysis, and physics.

4. Are there real-world applications for strange convolution equations?

Yes, there are many real-world applications for strange convolution equations. For example, they are used in signal processing to filter out noise, in image analysis to enhance images, and in physics to model complex systems.

5. What are some common techniques for solving strange convolution equations?

There are various techniques for solving strange convolution equations, depending on the specific functions involved. Some common techniques include using Fourier transforms, Laplace transforms, or numerical methods such as the FFT algorithm.

Similar threads

  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
401
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
287
Replies
4
Views
366
Replies
2
Views
387
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
242
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
745
Back
Top