1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Strange thing

  1. Sep 3, 2008 #1
    I realized something weird.
    That, suppose you take the rationals in [0,1], call this set [tex]Q.[/tex] [tex]Q[/tex]'s a Borel set, so if [tex]\mu[/tex] is Lebesgue measure, [tex]\mu(Q)=inf(\mu(V), V [/tex]open,[tex] Q \subset V).[/tex]
    [tex]Q[/tex] can be covered by open sets of total measure [tex]\le 1[/tex] by counting the rationals; cover the first rational by an interval size 1/2, the second by an interval size 1/4 ...
    But, [tex]Q[/tex] can also be covered by open sets of total measure [tex]\le 1/2[/tex] in the same way. Or by an open covering of arbitrarily small total measure ...
    It's strange considering that the rationals are dense in the irrationals. Yet you could leave 999/1000 of the irrationals out of the open cover ...
    Laura
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 4, 2008 #2

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi Laura! :smile:

    Why is that strange?

    Measure is supposed to be like weighing …

    if you tipped all the rationals into a pan and weighed them, you wouldn't expect them to weigh anything, would you? :wink:
     
  4. Sep 4, 2008 #3
    So you're surrounding each rational in [0,1] by an open interval; the rationals are dense in [0,1]; yet it can be arranged so practically all (say 999999 out of a million) of the irrationals are not covered by one of the open intervals. That's what is weird.
    Laura
     
  5. Sep 4, 2008 #4

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This observation (rationals are a set of measure zero) is one way of showing that the set of real numbers between 0 and 1 is uncountable. This is useful for those who don't like Cantor's diagonal proof.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Strange thing
  1. A strange solution ? (Replies: 5)

  2. Strange function (Replies: 2)

  3. Strange integral (Replies: 4)

  4. Strange Symbol (Replies: 1)

Loading...