Why are you attacking me?Sorry but I think you are talking nonsense, do you actually speak German?
From the Urtext:
... und bewegt man die Uhr in A mit der Geschwindigkeit v auf der Verbindungslinie nach B, so gehen nach Ankunft dieser Uhr in B die beiden Uhren nicht mehr synchron, ......
There is nothing ambiguous about it: the clock in A is moved with a velocity of v and arrives at B.
My point was that Einstein assumed instantaneous acceleration or his conclusions may be false with his statement.
So, the translation does assume this.
That mean's instantaneous acceleration (moved from a rest state to v) is ignored in the calculations for Einstein's teachings on time dilation.
that is exactly what I was saying.