1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

String theory question

  1. Sep 14, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    I saw the following equation in my (Zwiebach page 83).

    [tex]2 ds \delta (ds) = \delta (ds) ^2 [/tex]

    where delta is the variation from variational calculus and ds is the Lorentz invariant spacetime distance.

    It seems like they took a derivative from the right to the left but I am really not sure why you can do that because I thought delta was just a very small variation function.



    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 14, 2007 #2
    The delta notation means "change of" which is the same as derivative. If it makes you feel better, replace delta with delta/ dx and then multiply by dx on both sides to remove it. Seems a bit sketchy, but it works as long as the variation is small, which of course is the point of derivatives in the first place.
     
  4. Sep 14, 2007 #3
    So, in this case it makes the most sense to replace delta by d/ds, right? That does seem sketchy.
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2007
  5. Sep 15, 2007 #4

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It's not sketchy. d and delta are two different things. d refers to the differential of s(t) with respect to a parameter as in s(t)->s(t+epsilon). delta refers to the variation of some functional with respect to the variation of s(t) by a arbitrary function. s(t)->s(t)+epsilon*r(t).
     
  6. Sep 16, 2007 #5
    As Dick wrote, d and [itex]\delta[/itex] are not the same thing. ds as it is said, is the ghost of a departed quantity, while [itex]\delta s[/itex] is a boring old number.
    [itex]2dsd(ds) = d(ds)^{2}[/itex] is an exact equation.
    [itex]2 ds \delta (ds) = \delta (ds) ^2 [/itex] is approximate. To be exact, it should be
    [itex]2ds \delta(ds) + \mathcal{O}((\delta ds)^2) = \delta (ds) ^2[/itex]
    In this case, you are expected and indeed required to use only such [itex]\delta[/itex] as to make [itex]\delta^2[/itex] small enough to ignore.
     
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2007
  7. Sep 29, 2007 #6
    Sorry--I encountered this again and I am still confused about it. When you say replace delta by delta/ds (and then multiply both sides by ds), do you mean that I should treat this as the derivative operator with respect to ds? But can you do that if there is more than just one term in there (say [tex] \delta (dx dy dz) ^2 [/tex])? How do you think of it then?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: String theory question
  1. String theory question (Replies: 6)

  2. String theory question (Replies: 5)

  3. String theory question (Replies: 5)

  4. String theory question (Replies: 0)

Loading...