There must be a way to construct a Lorentz invariant[and causally(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

symmetric] theory that provides a detailed description of microscopic

quantum processes - including sub-Planck diameter violations of Lorentz

invariance that still becomes Lorentz invariant in the macroscopic

domain, via a statistical averaging of the ensemble of

multi-particulate microscopic wave functions. Thus the ensemble becomes

a causally connected sequence of space-like hypersurfaces, being

foliations that are themselves statistical[Gaussian] ensembles.

This would provide an accounting for a causally connected - evolving

configuration of macroscopic states. If it is entirely possible for

Lorentz invariance to be violated in the sub-microscopic Planck

lengths, then it could also be equally[symmetrically] possible for

Lorentz invariance to NOT be violated in the sub-microscopic lengths.

Thus, this bivalent symmetry of violation/non-violation is broken in

the multivariate statistical macroscopic ensemble. Thus macroscopic

Lorentz symmetry holds because another "higher energy" symmetry is

broken.

At the sub-Planck scales, all possibilities for existence must become

symmetrically equalized, due to the Heisenberg uncertainty DxDp >=

hbar/2.

A type of smoothed out infinite dimensional realm[Hilbert space?] of

isotropic and homogenous indistinguishability that somehow becomes

beholden to the specific macroscopic statistical averaging of

microscopic states. The uncertainty principle is merely a form of the

Cauchy Schwartz inequality, consequently becoming connected to the

"triangle inequality", which is a property of the N-dimensional

Riemannian metric.

Generalized Uncertainty:

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~jreyes/math23/uncertainty.pdf [Broken]

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Sub-Planck Symmetry?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Planck Symmetry |
---|

I Planck Emission Spectrum |

B Planck level effects of virtual particles |

B Why did Max Planck assume discrete energy values? |

I Size of an electron and Planck Volume. |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**