For a normal population growth we have the basic equation(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

{{dP} \over {dt}} = kP

[/tex]

I'm not investigating pop.growth, but temperature change, but it really shouldn't matter if I'm measuring degrees instead of people. The only problem I have is that this equation only seems to be fairly accurate if there is a general increase in the values as it goes along. In my experiment a room is heated for 24h, and I want to express the temperature change using the following set of equations:

[tex]

Q_P + \rho \cdot C_{P,Air} \cdot \dot V\left( {T_O - T_R } \right) = U \cdot A\left( {T_R - T_O } \right)

[/tex]

and

[tex]

m \cdot C_{P,wall} \cdot {{dT_m } \over {dt}} = U \cdot A\left( {T_R - T_m } \right)

[/tex]

I haven't done the experiment yet, but I'm not convinced that the temperature will always increase steadily, it might decrease in periods, and increase in others. What kind of model should I then use?

Of course, if the temperature does indeed turn out to only have a slow steady increase and no decrease, then there won't be a problem.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Sufficient model, or ?

Loading...

Similar Threads for Sufficient model | Date |
---|---|

Curveball Modeling | Apr 4, 2015 |

DE for modelling motion of a box | Feb 23, 2015 |

Modelling the motion of a meteor | Dec 13, 2014 |

Modeling Rain Hitting Surface | Apr 20, 2014 |

Sufficient condition(s) for a non-local diffeomorphism? | Mar 4, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**