Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Sufficient model, or ?

  1. Feb 6, 2006 #1
    For a normal population growth we have the basic equation

    [tex]
    {{dP} \over {dt}} = kP
    [/tex]

    I'm not investigating pop.growth, but temperature change, but it really shouldn't matter if I'm measuring degrees instead of people. The only problem I have is that this equation only seems to be fairly accurate if there is a general increase in the values as it goes along. In my experiment a room is heated for 24h, and I want to express the temperature change using the following set of equations:

    [tex]
    Q_P + \rho \cdot C_{P,Air} \cdot \dot V\left( {T_O - T_R } \right) = U \cdot A\left( {T_R - T_O } \right)
    [/tex]

    and

    [tex]
    m \cdot C_{P,wall} \cdot {{dT_m } \over {dt}} = U \cdot A\left( {T_R - T_m } \right)
    [/tex]

    I haven't done the experiment yet, but I'm not convinced that the temperature will always increase steadily, it might decrease in periods, and increase in others. What kind of model should I then use?

    Of course, if the temperature does indeed turn out to only have a slow steady increase and no decrease, then there won't be a problem.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 8, 2006 #2
    That way of solving your current problem complicates everything, I suggest statistical analysis to then predict the changes in temperature instead. By the way, a dot on the V's head doesn't look right to me.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Sufficient model, or ?
  1. Modeling problem (Replies: 3)

  2. Kinetics Modeling (Replies: 1)

Loading...