1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Summation notation

  1. Feb 8, 2012 #1
    I am trying to understand summation notation and there are a few inconsistencies in my head that I would like to clear up.

    Suppose C is an m*n matrix and [itex] \vec{x} [/itex] is a 1*m row vector. Then,

    [tex] \vec{x}C = \sum_{i} x_{i}C_{ij} = \sum_{i} C_{ij}x_{i} = \sum_{i} {C_{ji}}^Tx_{i} = C^T \vec{x} [/tex]

    This is clearly wrong but I'm not sure which operation is wrong. In terms of dimensions it doesn't make sense since [itex] C^T [/itex] is n*m and [itex] \vec{x} [/itex] is 1*m.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 9, 2012 #2
    The discrepancy arises because this way of defining a matrix and vector does not differentiate between (e.g.) a row vector and a column vector. Have a look at this for a general introduction to Einstein's notation and this for it's implementation in your case. No issues there!
     
  4. Feb 9, 2012 #3

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Specifically, it is saying that
    [tex]\begin{bmatrix}x & y\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}a & b \\ c & d\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}a & c \\ b & d\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Summation notation
  1. Summation notation (Replies: 3)

  2. Summation Notation. (Replies: 3)

  3. Summation notation (Replies: 2)

Loading...