Summation of a series

In summary, the conversation centers around a request for help with obtaining a finite series sum related to the Mittag-Leffler function, with the original formula provided. The poster has tried using MATHEMATICA and another software, but has encountered difficulties. They mention using a bound for the Beta function to simplify the calculation, but are hoping to find a solution without relying on this approximate bound. They also mention a generalized version of the Mittag-Leffler function with additional parameters.f
  • #1
66
0
Dear Colleagues

I hope this post belongs here in calculus. It concerns a finite series for which I am seeking the sum. I tried using MATHEMATICA which didn't accept it. Perhaps if someone has Maple or any other software who can do it.

Here it is attached.

I shall be most grateful
 

Attachments

  • formula.pdf
    11.3 KB · Views: 85
  • #2
I forgot to say that a,b,c,k are all constants
 
  • #3
Dear Colleagues

I hope this post belongs here in calculus. It concerns a finite series for which I am seeking the sum. I tried using MATHEMATICA which didn't accept it. Perhaps if someone has Maple or any other software who can do it.

Here it is attached.

I shall be most grateful
Perhaps it would help to know where this sum came from?

-Dan
 
  • #4
Thank you very much Dan

(first of all, all constants a,b,c,k are positive).
I am trying to obtain bound (inequality) for Mittag-Leffler function E and I am about to reach this bound however except by imposing some restriction on the mittag leffler parameters. What I did is that I replaced the product of the two gamma functions in the denominator by gamma(their sum) x Beta( , ), because their sum is independent of the index j so it can be taken outside of the summation. But then MATHEMATICA didn't calculate it either; for it seems it is a combination of gamma and Beta function. So I used the bound Beta(x ,y ) < 1/xy so that the expression inside the two gamma functions are reverted to the numerator. MATHEMATICA was able in this case to calculate it. So I am trying not to use the bound on the Beta function which is approximate but I am however left with the original attached summation to calculate.

If you are aware of the generalized mittag leffler function it has two subscripts a and b and one superscript c all positive parameters. Now my bound is true provided that the condition 2a+b>1 is satisfied. But I know well through another reflection that the bound is true irrespective of any values of a,b or c, and my inequality become valid therefore all the time.

very grateful
Sarrah
 

Suggested for: Summation of a series

Replies
5
Views
446
Replies
9
Views
848
Replies
3
Views
699
Replies
3
Views
703
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
774
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top