- #1

- 16

- 0

n

∑ 3

k=0

How does this make sense when k=0?

∑ 3

k=0

How does this make sense when k=0?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- B
- Thread starter StevenJacobs990
- Start date

- #1

- 16

- 0

n

∑ 3

k=0

How does this make sense when k=0?

∑ 3

k=0

How does this make sense when k=0?

- #2

- 319

- 64

The sum is ##3+3+...=3(n+1)##

- #3

- 16

- 0

Oh okay. The lower bound is the index origin and doesn't matter if it is negative?The sum is ##3+3+...=3(n+1)##

n

∑ 3

k=-1

3+3+...=3(n+2)

- #4

- 319

- 64

Correct!

- #5

DrClaude

Mentor

- 7,758

- 4,268

To summarise,

$$

\sum_{k=a}^{b} c = c (b-a+1)

$$

for constant ##c##.

$$

\sum_{k=a}^{b} c = c (b-a+1)

$$

for constant ##c##.

- #6

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 10,884

- 5,460

i.e. one is counting fence posts, not sections of wire.To summarise,

$$

\sum_{k=a}^{b} c = c (b-a+1)

$$

for constant ##c##.

Share: