Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I doubted whether to post this in the homework section, but decided not to because a) it's only a very small part and b) I think my question is important in general.

Looking at page 107 of Zee's Introduction to QFT I am trying to get from (16) to (17). For this I need to evaluate several "inner" products like

[tex]\sum_{\alpha} (u^\dagger)^\alpha(p, s) u_\alpha(p, s')[/tex]

and

[tex]\sum_{\alpha} (v^\dagger)^\alpha(p, s) u_\alpha(-p, s')[/tex]

where - using standard notation, I think, u and v are the amplitudes of plane wave solutions [itex]u(p, s) e^{-i \vec p \cdot \vec x}[/itex], [itex]v(p, s) e^{i \vec p \cdot \vec x}[/itex] of the Dirac equation.Question:How do I do that?

It's also somewhat related to page 105 of Zee, where he calculates

[tex]\sum_s u_\alpha(p, s) \overline u_\beta(p, s) = \frac12 (\gamma^0 + 1)_{\alpha\beta}[/tex]

(and similarly for u -> v) in the rest frame and then without any explanation jumps to the general (8) and (9),

[tex]\sum_s w_\alpha(p, s) \overline w_\beta(p, s) = \left( \frac{\gamma^\mu p_\mu \pm m}{2m} \right)_{\alpha\beta}[/tex]

(with the plus sign for w = u and minus for w = v).

Apart from the fact I don't really see how he does that, I also don't think it will work for my question above, as [itex]u^\dagger u[/itex] is not an invariant, so we cannot first calculate it in the rest frame [plus I am not summing over s].

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Summing spinor products

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**