Superb Formalism between Charge, Mass and Geometrix

  • Thread starter ddr
  • Start date

ddr

Hi,

The main point of this formalism is the fact that just like the charges attract/repeal and that way cause changes in their geometrixes; the geometrixes also attract/repeal and that way cause changes in their charges. You can find my findings about this formal equalty between the Charge, the Mass and the Geometrix (which is the position in geometrical space) on this page:

http://www.geocities.com/dr_physica/sf.htm

I'd like to read what you have to write about it?!
 

ddr

Any Comment?
 
916
0
There's a paragraph in your web that i don't understand:
"The geometrixes as well attract or repeal and that way make changes in their charges (the positions in electrical space)"

I think that the charge of a particle is supposed to be invariant
Maybe you could explain it better :)
 

ddr

Originally posted by meteor
There's a paragraph in your web that i don't understand:
"The geometrixes as well attract or repeal and that way make changes in their charges (the positions in electrical space)"

I think that the charge of a particle is supposed to be invariant
Maybe you could explain it better :)
I'll sugest you to reconcider the blue equations on the page:
http://www.geocities.com/sf.htm

when you view the whole thing from the geometrical space:

-opposite charges attract;same repeal
-opposite masses repeal;same atract

when you view the whole thing from the electrical space:

-opposite masses attract;same repeal
-opposite geometrixes repeal;same atract

when you view the whole thing from the gravitational space:

-opposite geometrixes attract;same repeal
-opposite charges repeal;same atract

use the lifter while you are thinking about it.I mean the equation Dc*Qp=dc*qp can be considered as if Dc is the one action end, dc is the other reaction end while Qp is the action charge (on the Dc end) and qp is the reaction charge (on the dc end).This way you are in geometrical space where the charges do the attraction/repulsion.
But then again you can all rearange by swiching the places of charges and ends (Qp with Dc,qp with dc) and then you pass into electrical space where the geometrixes do the attraction/perulsion.

I don't know if you're getting my point but...
 
916
0
I can't see any blue equation in the page you gave
 
916
0
ddr,

you use a language very non-standard and I practically don't have idea of what you are talking about

First: What are those electrical spaces and gravitational spaces? Do they exist in a different dimension of our ordinary space?
Second: Mass and charge are not vectors
 

ddr

Originally posted by meteor
ddr,

you use a language very non-standard and I practically don't have idea of what you are talking about

First: What are those electrical spaces and gravitational spaces? Do they exist in a different dimension of our ordinary space?
Second: Mass and charge are not vectors
X-type of space is X-type of metrical space where X-type of punctuations appear and float.X=any of(charge,mass,geometrix);

mass and charge are as well vectors as geometrix is. remember that 1D is special case of 3D and 3D is general case of 1D so 3D covers all aplicable on 1D and more.so it wont hurt if mass and charges were considered as 3D vecotrs.
 

Related Threads for: Superb Formalism between Charge, Mass and Geometrix

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
669
  • Last Post
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
566
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
325
Top