1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Supernova problem!

  1. Feb 26, 2013 #1
    Hello community, I really need help with few assignments!!

    First one would be about Supernova:
    In a distant galaxy a supernova flash occured. When supernova reached luminosity maximum, galaxy apparent magnitude
    was 17,6. Before the supernova flash the galaxy apparent magnitude was 18,0. What was the supernova's apparent magnitude at it's luminosity maximum?

    Could you help me solve this and explain it to me ?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 26, 2013 #2
    So basically you've got the following:

    mg, msn, and mg + sn

    where mg = 17.6 and mg + sn = 18.0

    So we know that mg + msn is NOT mg + sn

    but we do know that

    Lg + Lsn = Lg + sn

    Do you have any equations that relate luminosity to magnitude? Or even a relationship between flux and magnitude, since F is proportional to L.
     
  4. Feb 26, 2013 #3
    Don't really have any equation or even a far-near one that would help in this problem. There is no actually luminosity mentioned as the numbers only state for apparent magnitude . I searched the whole net for relation between galaxy and supernova apparent magnitude, though did not find anything useful.

    By the way , this is not really a homework or something, trying to learn some astroP on my own :)
     
  5. Feb 26, 2013 #4
    Of course there's the basic m1 - m2 = -2.5 log10 ( F1 / F2)

    Where we can inputed m1 and m2 , though not sure which would I put in first. Like m1=mg and m2=mg+sn.

    The final question is what was the Supernova's magnitude in the flash. Not sure this formula is useful in that way.
     
  6. Feb 26, 2013 #5
    you want to do something like

    [itex]\frac{F_{sn+g}}{F_{g}} = 10^{\frac{m_{sn + g} - m_{g}}{-2.5}}[/itex]

    I just solved your equation for the ratio of the fluxes.

    Now we also know that we can just add up the fluxes, i.e.

    Fsn + g = Fg + Fsn

    does this help? Remember that if you get a number for the magnitude, it should be something comparable to the two magnitudes you've already got.
     
  7. Feb 26, 2013 #6

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...

    Thread re-opened. Froddo -- check your PMs.
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2013
  8. Feb 26, 2013 #7
    Done berkman :)

    On-topic : I've tried to solve the problem whole night with no results, I think I'm missing something important. Anyone with experience could give me some heads up ? Not sure where to begin..
     
  9. Feb 27, 2013 #8

    Bandersnatch

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Let's try doing it in a more step-by-step fashion.

    Look at the equation you provided in post #4. You needn't throw your condescension at it by calling it "basic", as this is your workhorse here. You won't be doing much more than playing with it.

    Shishkabob solved the first step for you in post #5.
    He took the two magnitudes you were given, as defined by yourself in post #4, and after plugging them in to the equation and using the definition of the logarithm(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm#Definition), he got a relation from which it should be easy to extract the value of Fsn as a factor of Fg.
    In other words, it'll tell you how many times the supernova was brighter/dimmer than the galaxy.


    Notice that it doesn't matter which goes first and which goes second when you plug the values here:

    m1 - m2 = -2.5 log10 ( F1 / F2)

    the end result is the same as if it were:

    m2 - m1 = -2.5 log10 ( F2 / F1)

    Now, use the same equation again, only this time with the values for the galaxy(mg, Fg) and the supernova(msn, Fsn). Plug in the value for Fsn from the previous calculations.
    The flux will dissapear from the equation, and you'll be left with a common logarithm, whose value you can check in the tables, e.g. here:
    http://www.sosmath.com/tables/logtable/logtable.html

    In the end, you should end up with the ratio of fluxes Fsn=~0,45Fg,
    and supernova magnitude around 18,9.
    Which is good, as we know that one magnitude difference corresponds to two-and-a-half times difference in flux, and here we've got something in that range.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted