Supposed c-decay

  • Thread starter Phobos
  • Start date

Phobos

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,927
6
from chroot in this topic...
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6799

All such attempts to show the supposed 'c-decay' have involved the researcher cherry-picking observations in support of his hypothesis. In at least one case I've seen, the researcher committed deep intellectual dishonesty and actually reported an erroneous datum specifically to make it agree with his hypothesis.

Modern physics does not support c-decay, nor any mechanism that might support it. There is no experimental evidence that shows it happens, and a great deal of theoretical work that shows it cannot.
What's the history of this research?
Can anyone provide some good links/cites debunking the idea of c-decay?
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Supposed c-decay" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Supposed c-decay

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
946
  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
992
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
1K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top