• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Surface integrals

  • Thread starter alexvenk
  • Start date
  • #1
11
0

Homework Statement


Its more of a general issue of understanding than a specific problem

I have to evaluate a few surface integrals and im not sure about the geometric significance of what im evaluating or even of what to evaluate. Examples.

If n is the unit normal to the surface S evaluate Integral of: r . n dS over a) a unit cube. b) a sphere

Not sure what im evaluating or what the significance of it is. If someone could explain the general steps to take ill try and apply it to the specific problems

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution

 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
32,722
5,029
Let's consider r.n over the cube. In particular, at a face parallel to the YZ plane. Can you think of a geometric interpretation of the dot product r.n?
Regardless of any intepretation, are you able to do the integrals?
 
  • #3
11
0
Let's consider r.n over the cube. In particular, at a face parallel to the YZ plane. Can you think of a geometric interpretation of the dot product r.n?
Regardless of any intepretation, are you able to do the integrals?
If i know what integral to do, i can do integration, its just a matter of knowing what I'm integrating. Is r a position vector? r.n gives us the projection of vector r onto the normal of the surface.
 
  • #4
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
32,722
5,029
If i know what integral to do, i can do integration, its just a matter of knowing what I'm integrating. Is r a position vector? r.n gives us the projection of vector r onto the normal of the surface.
Because you had written a dot between the r and n, and I know n is a vector even though you did not show it as one typographically, I assumed r was also a vector - presumably the position vector. And yes, their dot product will be the component of r in the normal direction. So for a face parallel to the YZ plane, the x component. Note that this is constant for that face.
dS is also a vector usually, though because of the n vector already there I'm not sure whether the question setter has already substituted n dS, dS being a scalar area element, for the vector dS. I'd need to see the typography of the original.
If dS is still a vector then clearly the integral produces a vector.
 
  • #5
11
0
yeah ok it makes sense that all of the sides of a cube will have a normal that is just in the directions of one of the axis

Here is the question:
http://imgur.com/jqJTF5h

im struggling with pretty much all the questions there, but we are specifically talking about 4 here.
 
  • #6
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
32,722
5,029
yeah ok it makes sense that all of the sides of a cube will have a normal that is just in the directions of one of the axis

Here is the question:
http://imgur.com/jqJTF5h

im struggling with pretty much all the questions there, but we are specifically talking about 4 here.
That helps. Seeing how questions 4, 5 and 6 are printed, I'm reasonably sure that the author is using ##\vec{dS}## and ##\vec n dS## interchangeably with the same meaning. Can you see how to write the integral in Cartesian form for the x=0 face?
 
  • #7
11
0
That helps. Seeing how questions 4, 5 and 6 are printed, I'm reasonably sure that the author is using ##\vec{dS}## and ##\vec n dS## interchangeably with the same meaning. Can you see how to write the integral in Cartesian form for the x=0 face?
Im not entirely certain but ill give it a shot:

http://imgur.com/umVYFS3
 
  • #8
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
32,722
5,029
  • #9
11
0
Your Cartesian substitution for dS is wrong. This is not a volume integral.
ahh yeah i was wondering whether that would be right or not, itll be dydx then, which evaluates at 0 right? do i then sum all the sides?
 
  • #10
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
32,722
5,029
ahh yeah i was wondering whether that would be right or not, itll be dydx then, which evaluates at 0 right? do i then sum all the sides?
No, not dydx. This is orthogonal to the x axis.
 
  • #11
11
0
No, not dydx. This is orthogonal to the x axis.
oh, i see, so dydz / dzdy then? does order matter?
Thanks a bunch for your help and patience!
edit:typo
 

Related Threads on Surface integrals

  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
835
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
771
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
4K
Top