Surface with prescribed metric

Main Question or Discussion Point

Consider a Riemannian metric in R^2, e.g. consider g given at a point (x,y) by the matrix
(1 x
x 1+x^2 )

Is there a surface S, embedded in R^3, which has the property that the metric on S which is induced by the Euclidean metric of R^3 coincides with the given metric g? If yes, what representation does S possess?
 

Answers and Replies

Chris Hillman
Science Advisor
2,337
8
This isn't HW, is it?

Hi, KarstenKarsten,

Consider a Riemannian metric in [itex]R^2[/itex], e.g. consider g given at a point [itex](x,y)[/itex] by the matrix
[tex]\left[ \begin{matrix} 1 & x \\ x & 1+x^2 \end{matrix} \right] [/tex]

Is there a surface S, embedded in [itex]R^3[/itex], which has the property that the metric on S which is induced by the Euclidean metric of [tex]R^3[/tex] coincides with the given metric g? If yes, what representation does S possess?
Sounds like you are asking for an embedded surface in E^3 which has the stated metric. A good keyword to look up in a good differential geometry textbook should be "Monge patch" or "embedding". In any case, the idea is simple: write down an undetermined basis (two vectors in E^3) for the tangent space to some point of S, form their E^3 inner product, and compare with the desired induced metric on S. See "Coordinate tutorial" at http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/group.html [Broken] for some radially symmetric examples.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
gvk
83
0
Hi, KarstenKarsten,
Sounds like you are asking for an embedded surface in E^3 ....
It looks like it is not embedded surface in E^3 (3D Euclidian space). If the surface is given to us in the form z = f(x, y), then the metric induced on the surface is

[tex]g_{1,1} = 1 +f_{x}^{2}, g_{1,2}=g_{2,1} = f_{x} f_{y}, g_{2,2} = 1 + f_{y}^{2}[/tex].

In Karsten case
[tex]g_{1,1} = 1 , g_{1,2}=g_{2,1} = x, g_{2,2} = 1 + x^{2}[/tex].

That means [tex]f_{x} =0[/tex] and should be [tex]g_{1,2}=g_{2,1} = 0[/tex].
Hence, the surface is embedded in some noneucleadian 3D space.
 
Thanks!

I realize now that, at least, one can find a conformally equivalent metric
g~_{ij} = c(x) g_{ij}
with c(x) the solution of c(x)^2-c(x)(2+x^2) +1=0. And with g~ be metric of a in E^3 embedded surface. The components of g~ can then also be computed (and are slightly more complicated terms).
 
Chris Hillman
Science Advisor
2,337
8
Right, you don't need a noneuclidean embedding space.
 
For me, it would somehow be counterintuitive that such an embedded surface should not exist.
But can I obtain from the surface with the conformally equivalent metric a surface which actually has the very same metric I started with? How?
(In the very beginning I started with the ansatz, as gvk proposed, of course...)
 
gvk
83
0
The Riemannian tensor for your metric is [tex]R_{1,2,1,2}=-1[/tex]. That means your embedded 2D manifold has constant negative curvature. Of course, you always can orthogonize your metric to get conformal presentation in isothermal coords.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Surface with prescribed metric

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
924
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Top