Consider the function f: Z -> Z, where f(x) 4x+1 for each x is an element in Z, here the range of F = { ... -8, -5, -2, 1, 4, 7...} is a proper subset of Z, so f is not an onto (surjective) function.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

When one examines 3x + 1 = 8, we know x = 7/3, so there is no x in the domain Z with f(x) = 8

But if g: Q -> Q, where g(x) = 3x+1 for x is an element in Q; and h: R -> R, where h(x) = 3x+1 for x is an element in R, both g and h are surjective function.

What I want to ask whether my understanding true or false:

1. We consider g is a valid surjective function because with x = 7/3, g(x) = 8, we can write 8/1, and so we consider it as a rational number

and

2. We consider h is surjective because 7/3 is a real number (we can alswo rewrite 7/3 as demcial...)

Thank you

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Surjective function

Loading...

Similar Threads - Surjective function | Date |
---|---|

Show a functions inverse is injective iff f is surjective | Aug 29, 2015 |

Determining if a function is surjective | Nov 29, 2012 |

Denumerable set and surjective function | Oct 19, 2011 |

Prove set S is countable iff there exists a surjective/injective function | Apr 12, 2010 |

Bijections result when the function is surjective and injective | May 5, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**