I was wondering if anyone could show me why a syllogism of the form oai-3 is invalid.
I was hoping someone else would answer this because I have no idea what "oai-3" means!
These are the initials of the famous Aristotelean syllogisms:
A; All S is P
E : No S is P
I : Some S is P
O : Some S is not P
Now an OAI-3 IS combination out of the 600 something ,not all of course valid
I think Deadalus1 must not make his question deadalodic and give us the syllogism
Separate names with a comma.