The Hamiltonian, [tex]H=\frac{1}{2}\vec{\varsigma}K\vec{\varsigma}[/tex] is given.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

With K being a [tex] 2n \times 2n[/tex] matrix with the entries: [tex] \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}

0 & \tau \\

\vartheta & 0\end{array} \right)\] [/tex]

and [tex]\vec{\varsigma}[/tex] being a 2n-dimensional vector with entries: [tex]\vec{\varsigma}=[\vec q,\vec p]^T[/tex] with [tex]\vec q[/tex] and [tex]\vec p[/tex] being n-dimensional consisting of the generalized coordinates and generalized momenta respectively.

To this there is a matrix M whose columns are eigenvectors of the matrix JK with J being the matrix:

[tex] \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}

0 & 1 \\

-1 & 0\end{array} \right)\] [/tex]

The corresponding eigenvalues to the eigenvectors are [tex]\pm \omega_j[/tex] .

My problem is: ``For all eigenvalues [tex]\omega_j[/tex] being distinct show that the normalization of the eigenvectors can be chosen in such a way that M has the properties of the Jacobian matrix.''

Another problem is to show that after this canonical transformation the new Hamiltonian, K, takes the form [tex]K=i \sum_{j=1}^n \omega_j Q_j P_j[/tex]

There should also be an ansatz putting [tex]\varsigma_j = \varsigma_0 e^{i\omega_j t}[/tex]

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Symplectic notation problem

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**