Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Symplectic notation problem

  1. Jan 14, 2008 #1
    The Hamiltonian, [tex]H=\frac{1}{2}\vec{\varsigma}K\vec{\varsigma}[/tex] is given.

    With K being a [tex] 2n \times 2n[/tex] matrix with the entries: [tex] \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}
    0 & \tau \\
    \vartheta & 0\end{array} \right)\] [/tex]

    and [tex]\vec{\varsigma}[/tex] being a 2n-dimensional vector with entries: [tex]\vec{\varsigma}=[\vec q,\vec p]^T[/tex] with [tex]\vec q[/tex] and [tex]\vec p[/tex] being n-dimensional consisting of the generalized coordinates and generalized momenta respectively.
    To this there is a matrix M whose columns are eigenvectors of the matrix JK with J being the matrix:
    [tex] \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}
    0 & 1 \\
    -1 & 0\end{array} \right)\] [/tex]

    The corresponding eigenvalues to the eigenvectors are [tex]\pm \omega_j[/tex] .

    My problem is: ``For all eigenvalues [tex]\omega_j[/tex] being distinct show that the normalization of the eigenvectors can be chosen in such a way that M has the properties of the Jacobian matrix.''

    Another problem is to show that after this canonical transformation the new Hamiltonian, K, takes the form [tex]K=i \sum_{j=1}^n \omega_j Q_j P_j[/tex]

    There should also be an ansatz putting [tex]\varsigma_j = \varsigma_0 e^{i\omega_j t}[/tex]
  2. jcsd
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted